Message from @PieOhMy

Discord ID: 601825439740067880


2019-07-19 16:11:16 UTC  

This cycle of retardation will continue to escalate.

2019-07-19 16:11:31 UTC  

Enlightened fart huffing centrists will achieve nothing as usual

2019-07-19 16:12:42 UTC  

True. However this doesn't mean anyone supporting today's extremists isn't also a retard.

2019-07-19 16:13:21 UTC  

Civil conflict is probably inevitable, and the left will likely triumph this time around as they have vastly greater institutional support and grassroots organization.

2019-07-19 16:13:57 UTC  

How were the NSDAP extremist?

2019-07-19 16:14:10 UTC  

Have you not read the 25 point plan?

2019-07-19 16:14:29 UTC  

Yes and MK

2019-07-19 16:14:40 UTC  

Detail to me whats extreme about it

2019-07-19 16:15:17 UTC  

Lebensraum is right there in black and white. is that not extreme to you?

2019-07-19 16:17:03 UTC  

Unification of the german people is bad?

2019-07-19 16:17:21 UTC  

It was a reaction to the treaty of Versailles

2019-07-19 16:18:14 UTC  

Lebensraum is not unification. It is invasion of non-german countries.

2019-07-19 16:19:44 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598762957257703438/601810401054818325/unknown.png

2019-07-19 16:20:01 UTC  

I started responding to you ignorant of your belief in german national socialism. That was clearly a mistake. Have fun dying in the wars your ideology will inevitably start and lose.

2019-07-19 16:20:03 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598762957257703438/601810492520005658/unknown.png

2019-07-19 16:20:30 UTC  

Imperialism is good for the race; in general

2019-07-19 16:23:12 UTC  

More land = More germans

2019-07-19 16:29:05 UTC  

That's just factually incorrect. There are now more Germans who are more wealthy than there were when Germany was larger.

2019-07-19 16:29:57 UTC  

National Socialism turned out to work just about as well as Soviet Socialism.

2019-07-19 16:34:09 UTC  

Who classifies ones own wealth as their overall quality of life ? Who knows how many germans could of existed in GREATER germany

2019-07-19 17:19:26 UTC  
2019-07-19 17:27:31 UTC  

You can't date liberals. The retard game is fun.

2019-07-19 17:34:11 UTC  

We don't have to guess at "could have" because we know what was and what is. Your argument of what ifs is no different than notrealcommunism(tm).

2019-07-19 18:20:12 UTC  

No it's really not, if the density of Germany is maintained and they have more land. That would result in more germans

2019-07-19 18:20:23 UTC  

Simple mathematics, often beyond the scope of liberalists

2019-07-19 18:25:19 UTC  

Not liberals, leftists

2019-07-19 18:29:45 UTC  

There's not really any correlation between land area and population in Germany or elsewhere. Russia has the largest land area of any nation on the planet. This has not resulted in a large amount of Russians. This is really basic shiman.

2019-07-19 18:32:46 UTC  

Just imagine how many New Yorkers there would be if it was Wyoming 🤔

2019-07-19 18:56:55 UTC  

libs are the og leftists

2019-07-19 18:57:22 UTC  

@Jym that's because of siberia

2019-07-19 18:59:39 UTC  

Ah yes

2019-07-19 19:00:31 UTC  

Because America, despite being founded on Lockean liberal values, was *definitely* leftist, and definitely *not* right-libertarian

2019-07-19 19:01:17 UTC  

locke was an og leftist

2019-07-19 19:04:46 UTC  

It's always the ones with statues as their pics...

2019-07-19 19:04:51 UTC  

iirc locke supported equality before the law and a popular legislature

2019-07-19 19:05:39 UTC  

Siberia is not in Wyoming. Really you can't point to anywhere that landmass correlates with population. It was rotated to even suggest it would or worse that it is mathematically valid.

2019-07-19 19:06:29 UTC  

you're not controlling for confounding variables

2019-07-19 19:06:38 UTC  

you're just pointing out that population density varies

2019-07-19 19:07:58 UTC  

Well whatever confounding variables you can think up they apply universally because there's *no correlation between landmass and population * at all anywhere.

2019-07-19 19:07:58 UTC  

Given the original left-right divide originally referred to the actual seating arrangement in the French parliament in the 19th century, liberals were originally on the left.

2019-07-19 19:08:31 UTC  

if you have a group that controls x amount of land and you give them y amount of land in addition there will likely be more of them than if they hadn't received the additonal land