Message from @pwtdo
Discord ID: 601810038364962816
This was a phenomenon that had been building since the end of WW1.
Agreed
The back and forth between both of the extreme ideologies was the problem, not one ideology by itself.
NSDAP wasnt extreme
merely an antidote to bolshevism
Saying "violent commies good, violent fascists bad" is just as retarded as "violent fascists good, violent commies bad".
The problem we have today is that the mainstream media and the establishment political left are saying "violent commies good".
This is going to inevitably lead to some folk on the right saying "violent fascists good".
Fascism isnt rightwing
This cycle of retardation will continue to escalate.
Enlightened fart huffing centrists will achieve nothing as usual
True. However this doesn't mean anyone supporting today's extremists isn't also a retard.
Civil conflict is probably inevitable, and the left will likely triumph this time around as they have vastly greater institutional support and grassroots organization.
How were the NSDAP extremist?
Have you not read the 25 point plan?
Yes and MK
Detail to me whats extreme about it
Lebensraum is right there in black and white. is that not extreme to you?
Unification of the german people is bad?
It was a reaction to the treaty of Versailles
I started responding to you ignorant of your belief in german national socialism. That was clearly a mistake. Have fun dying in the wars your ideology will inevitably start and lose.
Imperialism is good for the race; in general
More land = More germans
That's just factually incorrect. There are now more Germans who are more wealthy than there were when Germany was larger.
National Socialism turned out to work just about as well as Soviet Socialism.
Who classifies ones own wealth as their overall quality of life ? Who knows how many germans could of existed in GREATER germany
You can't date liberals. The retard game is fun.
We don't have to guess at "could have" because we know what was and what is. Your argument of what ifs is no different than notrealcommunism(tm).
No it's really not, if the density of Germany is maintained and they have more land. That would result in more germans
Simple mathematics, often beyond the scope of liberalists
Not liberals, leftists
There's not really any correlation between land area and population in Germany or elsewhere. Russia has the largest land area of any nation on the planet. This has not resulted in a large amount of Russians. This is really basic shiman.
Just imagine how many New Yorkers there would be if it was Wyoming 🤔
libs are the og leftists
@Jym that's because of siberia
Ah yes
Because America, despite being founded on Lockean liberal values, was *definitely* leftist, and definitely *not* right-libertarian