The Holocaust also specifically only concerns the Jewish civilian victims of the German gov. - allegedly around 6 million. outside of that there is also about 5 million other civilian victims of the German gov..

Holobunga

Murdered for various reasons including political, ethnic, ideological or a mix of them all.

Sexual deviants, elites of the countries to be Germanized, all political opposition...

The infirm

**HAM** is typing...

I'm just curious to know why Sargon thinks we needed to go back onto the continent after our withdrawal? During WW2.
It's not like the Germans were suing for peace or anything. Oh wait.

Well to be honest with how Sargon's been going lately I honestly don't know what he'd even say.
Like his constant appeals to tradition lately and his defence of Eton elite being the rightful rulers of England bollocks to liberalism and proper representation.

Right wing populism is one helluva drug

He bought into the 19th century historiography of Glorious Britain

syncretic populism when

the entire 19th century is, for the Euro Empires of the time, the birth of History as a discipline

and it was born almost entirely as a propaganda too, explicitly so

he whole narrative of Britain as this unique beacon of Liberty comes from that

This destiny to lead the way in the field of personal freedom and whatnot. It's a powerful story

And I remember when he 1st started to buy into it

only went further and further down that road, and even at the beginning he was rather chauvinistic about it

understandably so, because his opposition wishes to degrade any English identity as much as possible

but I think he might be playing into their hands a bit

I think that he should have went nationalist but not chauvinist. As a strategy that is. Politically I think both are gay options.

but that is another story

I agree. He plays far to much into the Britain has been for freedom for a really really long time guys while we castrate homosexuals for winning the war

Land of the free (ultra puritans who's national religion was an attempt by the monarchy to gain ultimate moral authority over its citizenry as well as political)

(The castration of gays always just fucking confused me as a Pollack... To us this is such an outlandish idea... Like, gay bad, ok... But mutilation far worse so... Wtf? And why do you even care that much?! It's such a niche issue that rarely ever comes up to begin with... S'not like they suck dick in public...)

You know how the Russian Empire punished gays? It called them pansies behind their backs. Fucking ultra-authoritarian, the Tsar is above morality Russian Empire.

I've probably said it before in here but Sargon also said something rather silly in regards to the "battle" of cable street. That he would of been on the side opposing the British Union of Fascist.
Of course a charitable interpretation would be that he means he'd be on the side opposing the fascist.
However if we're to take this statement for what it is, Sargon is saying that he'd of allied himself with the violent rioting communist and I believe mostly foreign Jews in this case against the police. You know pouring human waste on them, throwing marbles under their horses (I.e trying to cripple them). In opposition to the fascist who instead turned around and had a peaceful March in the other direction.
Not looking good is it.
Especially when you've got the WW1 veteran campaigning for peace not war (in the form of Oswald Mosley) vs the WW1 general who sent tens of thousands of men to their death in a failed military campaign. And then wanting into war that cost hundreds of thousands of British deaths.
(Winston Churchill if you hadn't caught on)

Then of course if I'm to just compare the moral fortitude of Churchill vs Mosley just a little more.
Take the issue of India.
Mosley who held great sympathies to the suffering of the Indian colonies, decrying the crimes of sweatshop labour endorsed by globalist capitalism.
Churchill on the other hand compared Indians to rabbits when they were starving to death in the millions from a famine because he'd diverted food away for the war effort.

it's funny too

ethiopia as an italian colony prospered as it had never before while the brits left bangladesh to starve

of course, i'm not going to pretend the acquisition of fascist italy's colonial territories wasn't accompanied by a fair amount of brutality

but i find this interesting

brandon

incorrect

semitic peoples period show some relations to early europeans

as do early egyptians

not surprising

Well what colonies weren't?
It's simply a fact of life. Shit was shit.
That's why although it's highly convenient to do so I'm not terribly interested in the beating over the heads of commies with the various deaths caused by their socialist comrades.
Just address what's fundamentally true.
Putting lots of people who are different from one another always leads to conflict and conquest.
Hierarchy exists and is inevitably a part of human nature.
Violence is part of human nature.
So called Social constructs are naturally determined.
Despite being 13% of the population
Etc
That's enough justification for me to reject socialism and globalism without all the yeah but those chinky and Russian bastards killed a lotta people.

Well first

its primarily a meme

but the issue is the fundamental point is that at a certain point one can determine the logical end state of ideologies

as well as the repeated issues baked into the political application of it

If every single time it results in totalitarian governments , famine or lack of productivity

etc

at a certain point it becomes a valid critque against it and not just something you can wave your hand and say "well we promise we will do it right this time. Trust us ;))))