Message from @SuddenCringe
Discord ID: 604452135253573652
Yea he was in a sense
I mean he didnt start ww3
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
according to trotsky reagan was illegitimate as the united states is still the rightful territory of the british crown
>Imagine listening to Trotsky
Soft intelligentsia mass murderer
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck you're a mass murderer?
The kind of guy who sips amaretto after signing a stack of death sentences on randos
Basically Robespierre, but worse
When was the last time a revolution resulted in a democracy? As far as I know, the only revolution that resulted in Democracy in the US, and that was more of an independence movement, one thing is creating a system where there is none, another is when you destroy what you already have.
French Revolution resulted in the Great Terror, and Napoleon, Red October resulted in USSR, and other countless revolutions resulted in similar things, it's a breeding ground for dictatorships and murders.
I mean I'm not a democrat
The problem with revolutions is that they are pretty much totally unpredictable and ultra costly
The revolutions in early SA also were independence movments, but that's about it.
You don't just destroy a society and create an utopia just like that.
The fact they don't produce democracy doesn;t concern me much
the most recent one may have been the cuban revolution?
cuba is a shithole
go to cuba
if you count coups syria
Cuban revolution like what? Castro? Are you sure that's the best example you have?
it's a shithole
All shitholes.
oh the iranian revolution
Really
It always has been
Really? A fucking theocracy?
yeah
Iranian revolution was taken over by the priesthood lol
as I said
totally unpredictable outcomes
A theocratic dictatorship.
it's a theocratic republic
Good stuff.
YEah, with a supreme leader with power to veto everything including elected presidents.
Love a bit of authoritarianism
If you want sudden change of power at least go for a coup, not a revolution
much less damage, much more efficient
he doesn't have the power to veto everything
Yes or diplomacy
The Ayatollah is the ultimate authority on the interpretation of the Sharia, thus he functions kinda like the US Supreme Court, but the constitution can never be changed.
the guardian council is the equivalent of the supreme court