Every time I see someone who believes in intersectionality and other such shit

>white genocide isn't a thing in South Africa...

https://youtu.be/Pbj36KmCgbM

..."colonial theory" .. why do I have a migraine upon seeing that phrase.

Exposure to high quantities of stupid can result in dangerous spikes in blood pressure

(I don't have an Alex Jones handy, otherwise I would.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZo-6lomERU

What is your opinion about Sargons performance here? To me it seems he is really asking leading questions.

For example he went (10:05) "How have you found reaction to your resistance by identity politics because i mean you say.. *blaablaa framing* ... and so rejecting that out of hand i mean, you must be treated like a heretic." This is really bad way to ask anything, you are pushing an answer in the question.

It happened few times there.

His strong point has always been analysis, interviewing and being interviewed not so much. I'm not surprised he made an effort to keep the conversation in his comfort zone, and the point of the interview was more to showcase zuby's views rather than challenge them. So a hostile interview wasn't going to be conducive to that.

My point was not the tone of it, but the method. The question i took for example would have been a LOT better if he skipped the "you must be treated like a heretic" this would have allowed Zuby to answer it in a manner of his choice instead if going down the path Sargon had in mind. It being with the zone of comfort is fine and not really a problem.

Maybe, I think it was still a good interview. But I can see your point. I don't think it was planned though, I'd bet more on it being a bad habit that he probably has in any conversation.

Yes was a good watch, but that is a really bad habit to have if you want to extract information from people, it tilts it just that little bit towards what you want to hear or what you want the interviewee to say.Quite often just these things of small things will lead to bigger ones down the line, and it is really bad visually.

Yes, it would be best to quit the habit. His saving grace atm is that the idealogs on either end of the horseshoe are way more blatant with it and most won't notice him in comparison.

https://youtu.be/aUbsnXk0srU

https://youtu.be/lgo3Vu2JrOU

Yaniv is awesome, strong womyn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnhnShhxfhQ

I love how how that freak just trolls the shit out of that other freak.

...and all of society as well.

If he rapes a few young girls in the process, it's still worth it. I love his trolling.

At some point he probably sues some lesbian hoe for not sucking his feminine penis.

yea he'd win anything that he brings to the BC human rights tribunals / Canadian Human rights tribunals b.c those things are shit

I cannot stand Blaire's attitude, though. It's indistinguishable from (non-TERF) feminist. Heck, conservatives brag about being true feminists so it makes sense.

All the time Blaire tells Yaniv that he's not womaning correctly and everything would be OK if he played being woman better. All this predation would be OK if he was more passing and lied about being woman-woman instead of trans-woman.

Both of these people are sick

and unbearable

So Blaire basically goes "man bad, woman weak". Which is **feminism**.

It's exactly what mankind should not become.

I prefer Yaniv over Blaire because he's at least pushing back against insanity by endorsing it (when society would like to exclude him from receiving sympathy created for women), turning the law against it's intended feminist purpose, bankrupting female businesses. **GOOD.**

If men have a golf club, a gym, **anything** for themselves, the women (the normal non-trans kind) will push themselves in and demand damages for their suffering of being excluded. Now, a man *finally* demands having their balls waxed (even though he has to *pretend* to be a woman to use the law, the law is so broken that a bearded cis-men cannot use the same law that cis-women use for their entryism).

My question is: Why the fuck would anyone want to wax their balls?

Good question. My guess is that they don't want them waxed, and **expect** to get refused. They hope to be refused because A) they don't like balls waxed, and B) because he's going to get **FILTHY RICH** by suing the businesses for discrimination.

I just hope that once in his lifetime, one woman checked his bluff and said "OK, I'll wax your ball". And he'd be screaming in agony...

Make the waxing as painful as possible. Make it sloooooow.

does Yanvi examplify the extreme that most having been talking about on the right?
Yes
at some point does it almost seem like Yaniv is a plant
Sure
but this bitch seems to deep in the ideology of 'nothing i his fault' the world is out to get him everyone needs to change instead of him needing to change

i get some ppl like to find conspiracies and false flags everywhere but maybe this person is just a weak, shitty person that is trying to fuck over other people b.c they are filled with resentment for never amounting to much

I don't know if Yaniv is a plant but he's definitely a troll / ambulance chaser / grifter. I doubt politics are important to him. He just likes to play the role of Al Sharpton for trans-women.

(And if you don't know of Sharpton, he doesn't really care about the black communities either. He just wants money out of race-baiting and extortion. Yaniv feels like that but to trannies. Kinda like "bake the cake" stuff for gays.)

yes al 'race baiting' sharpton is a pill of shit

and i dont doubt that yaniv also just wants money out of this

but if you think B.C is going to change you be wrong. B.c is the canadian version of California.

British Columbia, State of Washingon and Oregon are all the same cancer.

And California too. They are all interlinked, funnily enough.

The entire west coast from Canada to Mexico border is made of cancer.