Message from @Wizard_of_The_West
Discord ID: 600366596694867978
cause he died
I'd actually encourage them to do more swapping of gender/race etc., ideally with ALL of movie history, so that every known protagonist ever will henceforth be non-white
non-male
non-straight
etc.
Sounds a bit gay tbh
The point is
If they do it unobstructed, it'll redpill just about every non-radical movie-goer
They do know that bond films were based on books.
They're doing it slowly and even this is redpilling the masses very slowly
Imagine what would happen if they did it rapidly
It would cause the left to implode
Why do people call Hitler the bad guy, but Mussolini is being somewhat sidelined? Because Hitler was more "successful", or more radical
It comes down to optics
"Screw your optics, I'm going in!"
Ultimately I see it as Germany being a very competent nation vs Italy which is known for its pizza and gelato
and losing almost as much as France...
Well sure, that too. My takeaway is that optics are directly proportional to scale.
lol France hasn't actually lost often
but w/e 😉
Yeah I would agree with that. Also Mussolini had impracticle goals while Hitler's goals were daring, but not beyond possibility.
That goes way beyond my knowledge
Hitler accomplished all of his goals but his interference in his own plans ensured he couldn't hold onto them.
Ya he shouldn't have blamed and gassed the Jews
Big mistake
He also shouldn't have redirected his assault on Moscow when they were only 50 miles away with almost 0 hard resistance
Hitler was bluffing throughout most of his conquests
The more I'm studying his wars, the more I come to believe that, had just one nation called his bluff, he would've been stopped
In the beginning definitely
Germany's army was not mechanized.
The English and French were and their biggest blunder was not advancing into Germany. They would've easily dominated.
Well, not sure about domination, but
France was weakened, so that's the one I understand the most
But Austria simply gave up, we didn't fight at all
I doubt Hitler could've annexed Austria had we actually faced him
To me it looked like Austria was kind of meh about it.
From all the wars, I know about Austria's annexation the most
Most articles and books I've read mostly focus on the invasion of France
The short version goes like this:
Over many years, Nazis took key roles in our politics, which was tolerated for reasons I will likely never understand. Austria experienced very troubling times due to violent political conflict between the parties and their supporters. A lot of people died due to terrorism.
There was also a lot of miscommunication at the highest levels between the Austrian president and the chancellor and so forth. And there were elections to be held, but they were unfortunately illegal and so the situation was very tense. Hitler moved in just at the very moment when elections were supposed to be held. He was afraid that after the elections he'd lose his chance to annex Austria.
Basically Hitler was carefully spreading chaos in Austria's politics with the help of Nazi infiltration. This chaos is what made it possible for him to just march in with no resistance, which comes down to the Austrian chancellor being a complete bitch who was too afraid for, well, we don't know exactly what he was so afraid about.
Civil unrest strongly added to everything.
Probably an imagined fear which materalized into a completely different one.
Yeah it was a lot of backdoor politics, so we'll never know.