Message from @wotmaniac

Discord ID: 601524131930046513


2019-07-18 21:17:07 UTC  

well, if paul presents that argument to *every* spending bill, then he's just being consistent

2019-07-18 21:17:16 UTC  

And i thought Paul was anti war.

2019-07-18 21:17:48 UTC  

Pauls are the exception, they in fact are consistent about it, which is why its just irritating

2019-07-18 21:17:50 UTC  

@SuddenCringe he's trying to say "fuck it, we already spend tons of money; why bother making the argument?"

2019-07-18 21:18:19 UTC  

That's some bullshit argument.

2019-07-18 21:18:26 UTC  

@Jokerfaic but the video in question is specifically calling out paul

2019-07-18 21:18:44 UTC  

because he blocked it. but the trend is still there

2019-07-18 21:19:36 UTC  

What trend? Rand Paul is anti war.

2019-07-18 21:19:47 UTC  

the vid is calling out paul specifically. paul is merely acting wholly consistent with every other thing he's ever done.
non-story

2019-07-18 21:20:12 UTC  

then I'm not being clear

2019-07-18 21:20:18 UTC  

secular talk just picked this out as today's axe to grind with conservatives

2019-07-18 21:20:39 UTC  

yeah, you're stretching this out to be about the system

2019-07-18 21:20:47 UTC  

Yeah everyone tends to that nowadays. A bit sad.

2019-07-18 21:20:57 UTC  

But especially Secular Talk, he is 100% biased.

2019-07-18 21:21:16 UTC  

Not really juding, he makes his position clear.

2019-07-18 21:21:34 UTC  

biased in which direction? he's no friend of democrats

2019-07-18 21:21:47 UTC  

He is 100% progressive socialist

2019-07-18 21:21:49 UTC  

yes, secular talk is an ideological talking head for the left

2019-07-18 21:21:56 UTC  

He is founder of that Justice Democrat.

2019-07-18 21:22:00 UTC  

With Chenk.

2019-07-18 21:22:08 UTC  

dems are establishment neos

2019-07-18 21:22:19 UTC  

yes? and then they went full SocJus and he left

2019-07-18 21:22:31 UTC  

after they kicked out cenk, for the above reason

2019-07-18 21:22:47 UTC  

He was forced to leave, but he was biased enough make a political organization, if that's not biased i don't know what it.

2019-07-18 21:22:50 UTC  

still a leftist ideologue mining for talking points

2019-07-18 21:22:52 UTC  

He is 100% socialist.

2019-07-18 21:23:08 UTC  

social democrat*

2019-07-18 21:23:12 UTC  

so you don't know what 100% socialist means, okie dokie, good to know

2019-07-18 21:23:30 UTC  

Ok, man. Cherry pick one comment and leave the debate.

2019-07-18 21:23:42 UTC  

I know what social democrat is and what's not.

2019-07-18 21:23:49 UTC  

>cherry pick
if you can't stand by your words, maybe you're the one who should leave

2019-07-18 21:24:05 UTC  

Yes, you cherry picked 100% socialist fast enough.

2019-07-18 21:24:22 UTC  

He is social democrat 100%, and he is biased, do you like it now?

2019-07-18 21:24:53 UTC  

<welcome to every political discussion in the history of the internet>

2019-07-18 21:24:57 UTC  

whether I like it or not is irrelevant, don't be pissy with me because you misspoke

2019-07-18 21:25:07 UTC  

"Oh no he missspoke~~~~"

2019-07-18 21:25:19 UTC  

C'mon dude, bring me a better argument.

2019-07-18 21:25:31 UTC  

Is he biased or not?

2019-07-18 21:25:57 UTC  

Yes? but he's not a "100% socialist"

2019-07-18 21:25:57 UTC  

I have a question: who in this world is not biased?

2019-07-18 21:26:02 UTC  

^