Message from @Jokerfaic

Discord ID: 601523988287586335


2019-07-18 21:15:49 UTC  

pointless

2019-07-18 21:15:53 UTC  

Some amendments sound nice to me.

2019-07-18 21:16:15 UTC  

the "bs" is that congress and the state department are busy giving the biggest slice of the budget pie to the Saudis and Israel as they can, and only break out the "but what about the cost" argument when that money is going back to the tax payer

2019-07-18 21:16:55 UTC  

neither party, neither organ of congress, and no department of government is innocent in this

2019-07-18 21:16:56 UTC  

What is this what aboutism. Why are we talking about Saudis.

2019-07-18 21:17:07 UTC  

well, if paul presents that argument to *every* spending bill, then he's just being consistent

2019-07-18 21:17:16 UTC  

And i thought Paul was anti war.

2019-07-18 21:17:48 UTC  

Pauls are the exception, they in fact are consistent about it, which is why its just irritating

2019-07-18 21:17:50 UTC  

@SuddenCringe he's trying to say "fuck it, we already spend tons of money; why bother making the argument?"

2019-07-18 21:18:19 UTC  

That's some bullshit argument.

2019-07-18 21:18:26 UTC  

@Jokerfaic but the video in question is specifically calling out paul

2019-07-18 21:18:44 UTC  

because he blocked it. but the trend is still there

2019-07-18 21:19:36 UTC  

What trend? Rand Paul is anti war.

2019-07-18 21:19:47 UTC  

the vid is calling out paul specifically. paul is merely acting wholly consistent with every other thing he's ever done.
non-story

2019-07-18 21:20:12 UTC  

then I'm not being clear

2019-07-18 21:20:18 UTC  

secular talk just picked this out as today's axe to grind with conservatives

2019-07-18 21:20:39 UTC  

yeah, you're stretching this out to be about the system

2019-07-18 21:20:47 UTC  

Yeah everyone tends to that nowadays. A bit sad.

2019-07-18 21:20:57 UTC  

But especially Secular Talk, he is 100% biased.

2019-07-18 21:21:16 UTC  

Not really juding, he makes his position clear.

2019-07-18 21:21:34 UTC  

biased in which direction? he's no friend of democrats

2019-07-18 21:21:47 UTC  

He is 100% progressive socialist

2019-07-18 21:21:49 UTC  

yes, secular talk is an ideological talking head for the left

2019-07-18 21:21:56 UTC  

He is founder of that Justice Democrat.

2019-07-18 21:22:00 UTC  

With Chenk.

2019-07-18 21:22:08 UTC  

dems are establishment neos

2019-07-18 21:22:19 UTC  

yes? and then they went full SocJus and he left

2019-07-18 21:22:31 UTC  

after they kicked out cenk, for the above reason

2019-07-18 21:22:47 UTC  

He was forced to leave, but he was biased enough make a political organization, if that's not biased i don't know what it.

2019-07-18 21:22:50 UTC  

still a leftist ideologue mining for talking points

2019-07-18 21:22:52 UTC  

He is 100% socialist.

2019-07-18 21:23:08 UTC  

social democrat*

2019-07-18 21:23:12 UTC  

so you don't know what 100% socialist means, okie dokie, good to know

2019-07-18 21:23:30 UTC  

Ok, man. Cherry pick one comment and leave the debate.

2019-07-18 21:23:42 UTC  

I know what social democrat is and what's not.

2019-07-18 21:23:49 UTC  

>cherry pick
if you can't stand by your words, maybe you're the one who should leave

2019-07-18 21:24:05 UTC  

Yes, you cherry picked 100% socialist fast enough.

2019-07-18 21:24:22 UTC  

He is social democrat 100%, and he is biased, do you like it now?

2019-07-18 21:24:53 UTC  

<welcome to every political discussion in the history of the internet>

2019-07-18 21:24:57 UTC  

whether I like it or not is irrelevant, don't be pissy with me because you misspoke

2019-07-18 21:25:07 UTC  

"Oh no he missspoke~~~~"