No matter what state that is.

It shouldnt be there

Fuck thay

States have rights

Else you're just going to have the rich paying for a higher quality of care compared to the poor

Which will just cause tension

Needlessly...

That has been the case for US since its creation.

the rich would still be able to pay for "better care" whatever the fuck that means

It's just too big.

No

Then you have an US verses THEM mentality, which as you can see. Is bad.

States have rights

So you want everyone equal.

Fuck that noise

A similar system between all states will also lower costs as well..

Federal govt too stronk, plz nerf

It tends to work the same in many different states.

They tend to copy from one another.

however if you make it an opt-in/opt-out system, you get the same problem Obamacare had ( I mean, amoung various others) where red states that dogmatically opted out saw a directly linked spike in deaths

Yeah

It will be tailored for each states, but pretty much the same thing.

If there's requirements that are in X but not in Y then companies need to meet all the requirements when they may not be required in the majority of states..

Obamacare didnt have opt out

U idiot

Not fully

You had to get special governmnet permissions to opt out.

but for something like this you'd more likely just see people move to the states where they have it, which then overburdens it in those states

Another housing crises :)))))

That has been always the case since its creations.

Obamacare required everyone to pay the individual mandate

Why is California so full?

More people flock to cities where there's a higher quality of care :)))

And why is everyone moving to Texas now?

It's will exists now, and it will always exist.

Because people dont liek vlblue policies

<:brainlet:505799727657254922>

By allowing states to determine most things

GOVERNMENT BAD!

It is ture, in some senses.

You can truly test the effectiveness of policies