I think everyone is ok with state one.

Because I'm ok with states doing almost anything optionally

State one is better than federal.

TBH, USA is too big, pays are way different in too many places.

Federal will be better than state..

living costs, too

Just imagine someone from Kansas paying the same amount of shit as the San Francisco.

There needs to be *some* federal baseline

yeah, state should be the jumping off point.

It needs to be state.

So you ensure that the quality of care doesn't differ too much

Between states..

Weez, i don' think you understand the costs of living between these states.

The difference is massive.

it should be able to differ, but it should also be fucking available

It still sucks at the state level, but I dont hold any grudges against it

I do, but there does need to be some sort of agreement on the BASE quality of care

And some basic fundamentals

So that they system is *somewhat* uniform across the entire nation

And people are getting the same *general* care

No

States dont have to add it

Else you're just going to get really good care in Cali and shit care everywhere else

Which won't do much..

Then you'll have people moving across state lines for better healthcare

They will get the same general care as the rest of the state.

It's good enough, really.

the only uniformity I'd fight for is that it just fucking be there. how it differes after that wouldn't be the fed's business

If you go to A, B or C then you should get X

This is America, federal govt nust be weakened

No

No matter what state that is.

It shouldnt be there

Fuck thay

States have rights

Else you're just going to have the rich paying for a higher quality of care compared to the poor

Which will just cause tension

Needlessly...

That has been the case for US since its creation.

the rich would still be able to pay for "better care" whatever the fuck that means

It's just too big.