Message from @Muten
Discord ID: 599420286776901663
I mean look at the woman
she looks very similar
She at least has hair
do baby's have hair?
no
Yeah quite alot do
when they grow up a little bit
You do know there are babies born with full heads of hair right?
no
Yes
Why do you know so much about babies?
pedo
I have a little brother?
I plan on being a father
So on
so why do you look at cp?
Fucking pedo
Projection isn't proof
it's not projection
bruh y'all heard of baby's
of guilt
<:Doubt:588038713938804760>
pedo
<:Doubt:588038713938804760> <:pepegun:588019479401726001>
@Gservator Lots of reasons. One being an inconsistent access to models. Others being that in some cases there were little, or insufficient formal training of how to properly observe and draw from life. But a big one was likely just that they didn't exactly have a glut of photographs to reference, and would sometimes just ape earlier works of art, rather than trying to do everything from scratch, and a lack of understanding for the process and technique might result in peculiarities. They had a huge problem, for instance, with proportion and perspective.
u the pedo
>muten out here just pickin fights with people today
>today
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
One of the reasons Da Vinci stood out, is because he would studiously reference real life. From dead animals, to human cadavers.
I mean he is a pedo
Nay, thou
<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
don't deny the truth
he is a pedo
bring him to justice
I took art history @Miniature Menace it was more of a question to goade a reaction like Mutens
ima need some proof sir
no, YOU'RE a pedo
kay