@Gservator Lots of reasons. One being an inconsistent access to models. Others being that in some cases there were little, or insufficient formal training of how to properly observe and draw from life. But a big one was likely just that they didn't exactly have a glut of photographs to reference, and would sometimes just ape earlier works of art, rather than trying to do everything from scratch, and a lack of understanding for the process and technique might result in peculiarities. They had a huge problem, for instance, with proportion and perspective.

u the pedo

>muten out here just pickin fights with people today

>today

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

One of the reasons Da Vinci stood out, is because he would studiously reference real life. From dead animals, to human cadavers.

I mean he is a pedo

Nay, thou

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

don't deny the truth

he is a pedo

bring him to justice

I took art history @Miniature Menace it was more of a question to goade a reaction like Mutens

ima need some proof sir

no, YOU'RE a pedo

kay

no you're a pedo

Projecting much?

why do you disappoint me

I think the lady doth protest too much

you can't even troll properly

Yesn't've You

why doth thine watcheth the loli porn liketh the fockin degenerate?

dou support lame fags like Gserv?

dou

miss me with that weeb shit

Yesn't've'll's You

it's short for do you

I'm at least capable of holding a conversation faggot

because I'm lazy

gay

what a lazy faggot

@Gservator no you are lame

>the faggot calls somebody a faggot

oy vey

I'm Bi you faggot

"holding a convo"

lame

a bisexual is a half-faggot

bi is gay