@leavethisbotnet What? Do you say this is not political? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYPMbLO4pAY

btw if you want a reasonable take in climate change, watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEWoPzaDmOA

*take on

And "leftists want to chop off boys cocks and pump little girls full of testosterone"

So do conservatives. Go ask Shapiro on circumcision.

That's about the level of discourse in your post

I don't think conservatives have a leg to stand on "you don't have to provocate just because you have the liberty". Conservatives provocate.

>circumcision is the same as chemical sterilization of complete removal of cock and balls

yeah, sure

Leftist brag about abortions, and conservatives pollute for the sake of polluting just to piss leftists off.

They don't even get horsepower out of those diesel smokers. Their only purpose is to **POLLUTE**.

You need bigger turbos to get more air if you want more power. Only increasing fuel will not give horsepower but increase smoking.

these guys aren't representative of the right, just like genderfluid trannies aren't representative of the left

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1PbgwowkeQ

btw I really recommend watching the video above I posted.
Shows that not all people sceptical of current mainstream climate science are anti science or cherrypicking.

I know. There's critique toward current mainstream climate "science" most of which is political interpretation, and I have much disagreement with globalist and socialist solutions to the problem.

For example, every western country wants to be the trailblazer on "green", but they aren't putting tariffs on Chinese imports that don't conform to similar limitations on pollution.

Everything on CO2 fighting is increasing socialism and bureaucracy in the west, while being a cash and employment transfer to China.

There's a _lot_ of underlying political bullshit yeah. There's more than that though. Lot of new and interesting science on that channel.

But... I just need to call out the hypocrisy of conservatives thinking the left is only gloating with their liberties. When so many people in the center say they are "regretfully pro-choice" or turning outright pro-life, why aren't rightwingers and centrist turning "regretfully environmentalist" because of coal rollers and other rightwing lunatics? Why is this only working against the left?

Their recent doc and plasma/electric universe is also quite interesting.

Because people (even in the center) think conservativism is the "new punk rock"?

How the fuck can conservativism challenge anything when it's **DEFINED** as status quo? Heck, conservatives love being labeled "feminists", they think they are better feminists than the left.

Maybe in the UK?

I don't think they much care for the label in US

Also I don't think that is accurate

there's a large proportion of people on the right who agree with the mainstream climate science.

I'd say larger than the proportion of leftists that are anti-abortion

Not that _I_ agree with the science. Though I'm still in favour of many of the policies.

Can't hurt to rid ourselves of dependence on russian and ME oil.

And coal plants produce a lot worse things than just CO2

Here's a paper from a UC Irvine professor claiming that Democracy is "Doomed" by right wing populism because the "elites" couldn't produce citizenry with the correct mental and emotional capacity to accept what is essentially open borders policies:

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8806z01m

The summation of its conclusion:

To conclude, we can ask if this trajectory and the promised results are inevitable. I think the answer is probably yes. However there is another possibility, if an unlikely one. Before it is too late, the democracies might directly address their own critical vulnerability, the inadequacy of their citizens. For reasons outlined in this chapter, the Madisonian strategy of managing inadequate citizens with less democratic, more republican institutions is no longer a viable option. The alternative is to create the citizenry that has the cognitive and emotional capacities democracy requires. This would entail a massive educational initiative, one that would have to bepremised on the recognizing the dramatic failure of prior efforts along these line. Perhaps in this way, democratic forms of governance may yet prevail.

In other words... we can prevent this through indoctrination.

Cause the citizens are "inadequate" to handle democracy responsibly.

We must reeducate the inadequate citizens... off to the gulag, comrade!

meh, the idea of the 'good citizen' is as old as time

who constitutes a 'good citizen' changes quite a lot throughout

Pay taxes, vote, and shut up about it if you don't like it, that's a good citizen