Message from @Weez
Discord ID: 616247759166504980
>Why don't you stand against virtually impossible odds
<:think:604636148970553344>
I'm all for standing and fighting when there's a chance of survival.
Well anyway this isn't so much advice for refugees but for those willing to take refugees. Why would you?
In war the possibility of death looms over all mens heads.
Ah, you should have specified male refugees then
"refugees" on its own, like you were using it included women and children
So I was a little confused, kek
Meh women tho. Like say the blitz for example. We only sent our child away from the cities.
Generally, young and middle aged male refugees ("Military male") can be turned away
The elderly and children accepted
Not so much when a convoy rolls up at your village and starts an ethnic cleansing
Out of the blue
When you're unarmed.
And your entire village is.
There was also a chance of dying from a bomb in the middle of the night
Much less likely than my example
And again, 'people' (The state) could easily defend itself
IE, RAF.
And we did.
They don't have the facilities or capabilities to do so
Nor the knowledge to do so
If they had those capabilities, then I'd say refuse em
Maybe accept the children and elderly
Most refugees don't escape convoys just rolling up to their villages because those people don't normally escape.
I think such example is entirely unreasonable
I'd say only children at least
It's how ISIS operated
It's how the Kurds were slaughtered
And has been for generations tbh
Same with the incident in the Georgian mountains
I forget the country
A historical massacre, which Turkey denies
Yeah but there's also kurds who are fighting back and not to badly if I'm correct
True, now they are were, with US support
Support which has now been withdrawn
Turkey has moved into kill them, as well as ISIS and Assad
*What remains of ISIS*
Here:
That was it