<:WhatThe:543598290936004638>

Pretty much. Liberty or Death you pussy

>Why don't you stand against virtually impossible odds

<:think:604636148970553344>

I'm all for standing and fighting when there's a chance of survival.

Well anyway this isn't so much advice for refugees but for those willing to take refugees. Why would you?
In war the possibility of death looms over all mens heads.

Ah, you should have specified male refugees then

"refugees" on its own, like you were using it included women and children

So I was a little confused, kek

Meh women tho. Like say the blitz for example. We only sent our child away from the cities.

Generally, young and middle aged male refugees ("Military male") can be turned away

The elderly and children accepted

@HAM There was a chance of victory in the Blitz

Not so much when a convoy rolls up at your village and starts an ethnic cleansing

Out of the blue

When you're unarmed.

And your entire village is.

There was also a chance of dying from a bomb in the middle of the night

Much less likely than my example

And again, 'people' (The state) could easily defend itself

IE, RAF.

And we did.

They, can't really

They don't have the facilities or capabilities to do so

Nor the knowledge to do so

If they had those capabilities, then I'd say refuse em

Maybe accept the children and elderly

Most refugees don't escape convoys just rolling up to their villages because those people don't normally escape.
I think such example is entirely unreasonable

I'd say only children at least

It's how ISIS operated

It's how the Kurds were slaughtered

And has been for generations tbh

Same with the incident in the Georgian mountains

I forget the country

A historical massacre, which Turkey denies

Yeah but there's also kurds who are fighting back and not to badly if I'm correct

True, now they are were, with US support

Support which has now been withdrawn

Turkey has moved into kill them, as well as ISIS and Assad

*What remains of ISIS*

Here: