@Jym I think we are fundamentally different. Namely, I understand that IQ correlates with success.

White nationalists are like BLM: they think that over-representation is discrimination.

@whiic

No you don't even understand IQ.....

IQ correlates with success, yes. But success alone is not a reason to trust someone to run your society.

@Jym Go hug, @Miniature Menace since you agree on that.

I mean, if Jews don't even have superior IQ, then @Miniature Menace is correct and Jews need eradication.

@whiic

KEK. Go watch your animu.

@Jym If Jews don't have superior IQ, and it's **UNDENIABLE** fact that they are over-represented in media, CEOs, science, etc . ...then is **LOGICAL** to agree with neo-Nazis that Jews are playing foul.

I also think it's legitimate for Black Nationalists to be concerned about their society being shaped by whites. Whites don't share the exact same values or culture as blacks. And depending on the subset, there's more or less in common. I think that it is essential for blacks to be able to self-advocate, without self-destructing. The same as I want for whites. Being wary of foreign or dissident elements is not the same as never trusting proven assets, based on ethnicity alone.

You either admit they have superior IQ, or they are fucking evil race.

You deny IQ, then you must kill the fucking Kike. It's logical.

What if it could be proven that there is a subset of high functioning pedophiles who have an average IQ of 150. Would you be alright with this subset of the population managing your nations laws, media, finances, education, and commerce?

Why not?

Okay then, at least you're consistent.

I don't care if they fap to lolicon. I'm not anti-"degeneracy".

@whiic

I really am going to crash out soon so I'll give you a quick rundown. IQ as a metric has only existed for a century or so. Now the scores are re-normalized to make 100 the median. This means as median IQ rises the definitoon of IQ changes. Over the last century (too short for any genetic evolutionary change to occur) the median score has changed by more than a standard deviation. The whole idea of 'racial IQ' is garbage.

@Jym Then why cannot niggers create a stable and prosperous government, anywhere?

@whiic

Black people in the US, on their own, would be the 8th largest economy.

LOL. What a joke,

They still couldn't establish a stable government.

Differences in IQ are not entirely genetic, especially in starkly different circumstances. In situations where levels of poverty are particularly stark, it makes sense for IQs to change over time fairly quickly. We also have to acknowledge migrational patterns as a factor. The IQ's of modern populations of a given area are not necessarily the direct descendants of the prior population.

Niggers might make a significant portion of US internal economy by working as cashiers, brute force, industry assembly, etc. but could they actually survive in an all-black ethnostate?

There's a huge amount of black wealth which is the consequence of the entertainment industry, where g is not as big a factor as specific intelligence subsets, aesthetics, or other marketable features and branding.

I see that our Alt-Righter is siding with black ethnostate idea and agreeing with Jym.

See you have to go to an ethnostate to get the result you want. You have to ignore geography and culture.

Somehow I'm supposed to be indistinguishable from Alt-Right. Ironically.

Which are both larger components than race.

This is not to say that the kinds of blacks who succeed in the entertainment industry aren't often brighter than average. But when compared to other industries, it's usually not as important.

@whiic

In some sense you are indistiquishable from alt-right or woke left. You see race as an essential determining category.

I would not undermine culture. For example culture of blacks in Commonwealth colonies is different from decendants of slaves in USA.

Meaning some niggers are actual niggers and others are just regular blacks.

The woke left has a really escheresque understanding of race as a meaningful category. Seeing it as both essential, and entirely constructed at the same time. This is due to the fact that they must both dismiss any rational arguments for exclusion, while also arguing in favor of discrimination against whites.

White as an identity must exist, but only when it's being presented as diabolical.

And whites are not allowed to exclude based on race, but they sure as hell better not forget that they're a white person talking to their moral superior, a non-white person.

It's not that different they take a degenerate social definition and you take a degenerate biological one.

Reality is degenerate, I guess?

You may have at one point encountered reality and fled in fear.

I'm not sure how my conception of reality is less terrifying than yours. I would very much enjoy if I could once again believe it were possible for anyone to be anything. Real Zootopian.

I approach reality holistically. I strive to not reject uncomfortable truths.

Instead, I try to work within the constraints of what reality provides to achieve the results I want. Instead of insisting the world is already how I want it to be.

How is labeling races as degenerate “acknowledging uncomfortable truths”