Message from @whiic

Discord ID: 618263682970812417


2019-09-03 01:51:55 UTC  

Wouldn't there by your admission be many differing Jewish agenda**s** that contradict each other?

2019-09-03 01:52:07 UTC  

Because it operates on common, though not *universal,* Jewish cultural values, and the most critical vector for its perpetuation are Jewish actors.

2019-09-03 01:52:59 UTC  

It's like, if you have the Italian Mafia. Not every Italian is a member of the Italian Mafia. But being Italian is a critical vector of affiliation, and a critical factor in priorities.

2019-09-03 01:53:07 UTC  

You really do dodge the question quite sleazily.

2019-09-03 01:53:08 UTC  

>Jews are not homogeneous.

> LOOK AT THIS JEW NAME!

2019-09-03 01:54:15 UTC  

I think I prefer Bakemonogatari rewatch over this retarded argument.

2019-09-03 01:54:29 UTC  

Have fun guys.

2019-09-03 01:54:51 UTC  

There are Jewish agendas which contradict each other. Like for instance the Jews promoting multicultural progressivism have actually in instances undermined the interests of Zionism, by calling the morality of Israeli actions to control its territory in the middle east into question.

2019-09-03 01:55:00 UTC  

I'm sorry @Jym but I'll leave you banging your head against the brick wall that is a typical Alt-Righter.

2019-09-03 01:55:06 UTC  

These weren't really *meant* to contradict each other, but they have.

2019-09-03 01:56:17 UTC  

You want me to mention some Jews who *aren't* gun grabbing globalists? Like Halsey, Danny Duchamp, Murray Rothbard, or Stefan Molyneux?

2019-09-03 01:56:47 UTC  

@whiic

Oh I'm just getting some keks and it's not like you two are fundamentally different.

2019-09-03 01:56:50 UTC  

So, no Molyneux is a filthy Kike as well?

2019-09-03 01:57:07 UTC  

Mollymeme is just an idiot....

2019-09-03 01:57:13 UTC  

Hell, Miller, iirc, a Jew in the Trump administration, has probably been one of the more hard line closed borders advocates.

2019-09-03 01:57:44 UTC  

@Jym I think we are fundamentally different. Namely, I understand that IQ correlates with success.

2019-09-03 01:58:06 UTC  

White nationalists are like BLM: they think that over-representation is discrimination.

2019-09-03 01:58:15 UTC  

@whiic

No you don't even understand IQ.....

2019-09-03 01:58:23 UTC  

IQ correlates with success, yes. But success alone is not a reason to trust someone to run your society.

2019-09-03 01:58:46 UTC  

@Jym Go hug, @Miniature Menace since you agree on that.

2019-09-03 01:59:08 UTC  

I mean, if Jews don't even have superior IQ, then @Miniature Menace is correct and Jews need eradication.

2019-09-03 01:59:23 UTC  

@whiic

KEK. Go watch your animu.

2019-09-03 02:01:17 UTC  

@Jym If Jews don't have superior IQ, and it's **UNDENIABLE** fact that they are over-represented in media, CEOs, science, etc . ...then is **LOGICAL** to agree with neo-Nazis that Jews are playing foul.

2019-09-03 02:01:31 UTC  

I also think it's legitimate for Black Nationalists to be concerned about their society being shaped by whites. Whites don't share the exact same values or culture as blacks. And depending on the subset, there's more or less in common. I think that it is essential for blacks to be able to self-advocate, without self-destructing. The same as I want for whites. Being wary of foreign or dissident elements is not the same as never trusting proven assets, based on ethnicity alone.

2019-09-03 02:01:32 UTC  

You either admit they have superior IQ, or they are fucking evil race.

2019-09-03 02:01:52 UTC  

You deny IQ, then you must kill the fucking Kike. It's logical.

2019-09-03 02:03:17 UTC  

What if it could be proven that there is a subset of high functioning pedophiles who have an average IQ of 150. Would you be alright with this subset of the population managing your nations laws, media, finances, education, and commerce?

2019-09-03 02:03:58 UTC  

Why not?

2019-09-03 02:04:07 UTC  

Okay then, at least you're consistent.

2019-09-03 02:04:27 UTC  

I don't care if they fap to lolicon. I'm not anti-"degeneracy".

2019-09-03 02:04:30 UTC  

@whiic

I really am going to crash out soon so I'll give you a quick rundown. IQ as a metric has only existed for a century or so. Now the scores are re-normalized to make 100 the median. This means as median IQ rises the definitoon of IQ changes. Over the last century (too short for any genetic evolutionary change to occur) the median score has changed by more than a standard deviation. The whole idea of 'racial IQ' is garbage.

2019-09-03 02:05:38 UTC  

@Jym Then why cannot niggers create a stable and prosperous government, anywhere?

2019-09-03 02:07:45 UTC  

@whiic

Black people in the US, on their own, would be the 8th largest economy.

2019-09-03 02:08:00 UTC  

LOL. What a joke,

2019-09-03 02:08:25 UTC  

They still couldn't establish a stable government.

2019-09-03 02:08:47 UTC  

Differences in IQ are not entirely genetic, especially in starkly different circumstances. In situations where levels of poverty are particularly stark, it makes sense for IQs to change over time fairly quickly. We also have to acknowledge migrational patterns as a factor. The IQ's of modern populations of a given area are not necessarily the direct descendants of the prior population.

2019-09-03 02:09:41 UTC  

Niggers might make a significant portion of US internal economy by working as cashiers, brute force, industry assembly, etc. but could they actually survive in an all-black ethnostate?

2019-09-03 02:11:02 UTC  

There's a huge amount of black wealth which is the consequence of the entertainment industry, where g is not as big a factor as specific intelligence subsets, aesthetics, or other marketable features and branding.

2019-09-03 02:11:09 UTC  

I see that our Alt-Righter is siding with black ethnostate idea and agreeing with Jym.

2019-09-03 02:11:32 UTC  

See you have to go to an ethnostate to get the result you want. You have to ignore geography and culture.

2019-09-03 02:11:42 UTC  

Somehow I'm supposed to be indistinguishable from Alt-Right. Ironically.