Also, the Jewish elites probably feel as little real comradarie for the Jewish plebs as most White elites do for white plebs.

The **WHY** treat Jews as homogenous group if they aren't entirely homogenous?

I don't.

Oh, it's that key word "most". So Jews are exception.

You even *italicized* it.

So Jews are. (Except Karl Marx who is the exception without being an exception.)

I never said the Jews were entirely homogeneous.

Which group is then?

Your **treat** as if Jews were the only homogeneous group.

But you claim they aren't. Which are then? You used the word "most" so some group is homogeneous.

I don't know of any entirely homogeneous group. Just that one could hypothetically exist.

Especially not sufficiently large groups.

If Jews are not homogeneous, then why is there a "Jewish agenda"?

Wouldn't there by your admission be many differing Jewish agenda**s** that contradict each other?

Because it operates on common, though not *universal,* Jewish cultural values, and the most critical vector for its perpetuation are Jewish actors.

It's like, if you have the Italian Mafia. Not every Italian is a member of the Italian Mafia. But being Italian is a critical vector of affiliation, and a critical factor in priorities.

You really do dodge the question quite sleazily.

>Jews are not homogeneous.

> LOOK AT THIS JEW NAME!

I think I prefer Bakemonogatari rewatch over this retarded argument.

Have fun guys.

There are Jewish agendas which contradict each other. Like for instance the Jews promoting multicultural progressivism have actually in instances undermined the interests of Zionism, by calling the morality of Israeli actions to control its territory in the middle east into question.

I'm sorry @Jym but I'll leave you banging your head against the brick wall that is a typical Alt-Righter.

These weren't really *meant* to contradict each other, but they have.

You want me to mention some Jews who *aren't* gun grabbing globalists? Like Halsey, Danny Duchamp, Murray Rothbard, or Stefan Molyneux?

@whiic

Oh I'm just getting some keks and it's not like you two are fundamentally different.

So, no Molyneux is a filthy Kike as well?

Mollymeme is just an idiot....

Hell, Miller, iirc, a Jew in the Trump administration, has probably been one of the more hard line closed borders advocates.

@Jym I think we are fundamentally different. Namely, I understand that IQ correlates with success.

White nationalists are like BLM: they think that over-representation is discrimination.

@whiic

No you don't even understand IQ.....

IQ correlates with success, yes. But success alone is not a reason to trust someone to run your society.

@Jym Go hug, @Miniature Menace since you agree on that.

I mean, if Jews don't even have superior IQ, then @Miniature Menace is correct and Jews need eradication.

@whiic

KEK. Go watch your animu.

@Jym If Jews don't have superior IQ, and it's **UNDENIABLE** fact that they are over-represented in media, CEOs, science, etc . ...then is **LOGICAL** to agree with neo-Nazis that Jews are playing foul.

I also think it's legitimate for Black Nationalists to be concerned about their society being shaped by whites. Whites don't share the exact same values or culture as blacks. And depending on the subset, there's more or less in common. I think that it is essential for blacks to be able to self-advocate, without self-destructing. The same as I want for whites. Being wary of foreign or dissident elements is not the same as never trusting proven assets, based on ethnicity alone.

You either admit they have superior IQ, or they are fucking evil race.

You deny IQ, then you must kill the fucking Kike. It's logical.

What if it could be proven that there is a subset of high functioning pedophiles who have an average IQ of 150. Would you be alright with this subset of the population managing your nations laws, media, finances, education, and commerce?

Why not?