Message from @Miniature Menace
Discord ID: 618261629255155742
I mean, even if Karl Marx was Jew-hating, he's still judged as beign ethnically Jewish. No consideration about being individual.
What part of individuals acting in concert towards common goals precludes the reality that individuals exist?
I'm going to watch some Hellsing Ultimate OVA.... or maybe rewatch Bakemonogatari before watching Nisemonogatari.
I think it's been at least half a decade since I watched Bakemonogatari the first time so rewatching that series is necessary before watching the sequel.
@Miniature Menace Maybe the part where part of Jews want to destroy the Jews?
Namely Karl Marx writing a book on "Jewish Question" which via Hitler **LEAD TO THE FUCKING HOLOCAUST**.
Maybe that (retard)?
@whiic
Miss me with that weeb shit. I'm re-watching The Expanse and zoning out. Holiday weekend is over now.
I don't know why I should have to clarify this, *most* groups aren't entirely homogeneous in the values and goals of every individual, and can have different priorities. Hell, let's say you have a corporation. Employees of that corporation can try to find ways of making their corporation more profitable, while also deliberately undermining other employees they're in competition with for a promotion. And Jews aren't a "corporation." There's more factionalization, many people are basically nothing to each other, but when it comes time to decide who should be in inner circles, they'll often choose other jews. They usually know other jews, associate with them a lot, maybe they're cousins, in-laws, maybe they go to the same temple.
Also, the Jewish elites probably feel as little real comradarie for the Jewish plebs as most White elites do for white plebs.
The **WHY** treat Jews as homogenous group if they aren't entirely homogenous?
I don't.
Oh, it's that key word "most". So Jews are exception.
You even *italicized* it.
So Jews are. (Except Karl Marx who is the exception without being an exception.)
I never said the Jews were entirely homogeneous.
Which group is then?
Your **treat** as if Jews were the only homogeneous group.
But you claim they aren't. Which are then? You used the word "most" so some group is homogeneous.
I don't know of any entirely homogeneous group. Just that one could hypothetically exist.
If Jews are not homogeneous, then why is there a "Jewish agenda"?
Wouldn't there by your admission be many differing Jewish agenda**s** that contradict each other?
Because it operates on common, though not *universal,* Jewish cultural values, and the most critical vector for its perpetuation are Jewish actors.
It's like, if you have the Italian Mafia. Not every Italian is a member of the Italian Mafia. But being Italian is a critical vector of affiliation, and a critical factor in priorities.
You really do dodge the question quite sleazily.
>Jews are not homogeneous.
> LOOK AT THIS JEW NAME!
I think I prefer Bakemonogatari rewatch over this retarded argument.
Have fun guys.
There are Jewish agendas which contradict each other. Like for instance the Jews promoting multicultural progressivism have actually in instances undermined the interests of Zionism, by calling the morality of Israeli actions to control its territory in the middle east into question.
I'm sorry @Jym but I'll leave you banging your head against the brick wall that is a typical Alt-Righter.
These weren't really *meant* to contradict each other, but they have.
You want me to mention some Jews who *aren't* gun grabbing globalists? Like Halsey, Danny Duchamp, Murray Rothbard, or Stefan Molyneux?
@whiic
Oh I'm just getting some keks and it's not like you two are fundamentally different.
So, no Molyneux is a filthy Kike as well?
Mollymeme is just an idiot....
Hell, Miller, iirc, a Jew in the Trump administration, has probably been one of the more hard line closed borders advocates.
@Jym I think we are fundamentally different. Namely, I understand that IQ correlates with success.
White nationalists are like BLM: they think that over-representation is discrimination.
IQ correlates with success, yes. But success alone is not a reason to trust someone to run your society.