I was responding to Jym

Nuke Italy for pederasty and child-rape for all I care. Fuck RCC and Italy. Nuke them all.

If Italy doesn't invade the Vatican and kill the Pope, then nuke Italy.

If you were responding to me you did a poor job of it....

How? I explained why one might be justified in concern about "Catholic interests" or why someone might operate in favor of them. Values, ethnicity, religion, tribe, this all factors into loyalty.

Catholics are less an ethnicity, than Jews. But even then Jews are also multiple ethnicities, which don't always cooperate. The chief actors in the west, as far as I'm aware, tend to be Ashkenazi, but there's also some Sephardic.

You clearly know less about Catholics than you do about Jews then....

And I suspect you're not going to explain how.

Am I mistaken?

"Catholic Interests" are no more uniform than "Jewish interests".

I never claimed that Jewish interests were entirely monolithic.

Again not explaining, merely staying amused. I do not think explainations can penetrate your limited worldveiw.

LOL

It's funny because you think that makes you sound smart, but it just sounds like you don't want to explain why you've already decided you don't need to change your mind, because you can't construct it into a real argument.

Like, 6 years ago I pretty much thought the same thing you did about the Jews. And it took a considerable amount of evidence and persuasion, often from Jews themselves, to understand I was wrong.

None of this looking out for their tribal interests makes them evil. Specific strategies are very destructive and antagonistic. But just caring about your own, and your values, the cultural chauvinism, isn't bad. It was actually sort of necessary to maintain an identity. But that disparity in culture inevitably results in conflict over time, as there's a contest for limited resources, control of laws, etc.

Just my best assessment of your character. Unfortunate that it woulnds your feelings. I assume at this point you will type another paragraph or 7 of non-sequitors....

You're a poor judge of character.

I'm going to leave you to discuss about collectivist ideas such as "Jewish interests" and "Catholic interest" as if individuals don't exist.

I mean, even if Karl Marx was Jew-hating, he's still judged as beign ethnically Jewish. No consideration about being individual.

What part of individuals acting in concert towards common goals precludes the reality that individuals exist?

I'm going to watch some Hellsing Ultimate OVA.... or maybe rewatch Bakemonogatari before watching Nisemonogatari.

I think it's been at least half a decade since I watched Bakemonogatari the first time so rewatching that series is necessary before watching the sequel.

@Miniature Menace Maybe the part where part of Jews want to destroy the Jews?

Namely Karl Marx writing a book on "Jewish Question" which via Hitler **LEAD TO THE FUCKING HOLOCAUST**.

Maybe that (retard)?

@whiic

Miss me with that weeb shit. I'm re-watching The Expanse and zoning out. Holiday weekend is over now.

I don't know why I should have to clarify this, *most* groups aren't entirely homogeneous in the values and goals of every individual, and can have different priorities. Hell, let's say you have a corporation. Employees of that corporation can try to find ways of making their corporation more profitable, while also deliberately undermining other employees they're in competition with for a promotion. And Jews aren't a "corporation." There's more factionalization, many people are basically nothing to each other, but when it comes time to decide who should be in inner circles, they'll often choose other jews. They usually know other jews, associate with them a lot, maybe they're cousins, in-laws, maybe they go to the same temple.

Also, the Jewish elites probably feel as little real comradarie for the Jewish plebs as most White elites do for white plebs.

The **WHY** treat Jews as homogenous group if they aren't entirely homogenous?

I don't.

Oh, it's that key word "most". So Jews are exception.

You even *italicized* it.

So Jews are. (Except Karl Marx who is the exception without being an exception.)

I never said the Jews were entirely homogeneous.

Which group is then?

Your **treat** as if Jews were the only homogeneous group.

But you claim they aren't. Which are then? You used the word "most" so some group is homogeneous.

I don't know of any entirely homogeneous group. Just that one could hypothetically exist.

Especially not sufficiently large groups.

If Jews are not homogeneous, then why is there a "Jewish agenda"?