much cleaner

if anything it'd be Caen 2

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VT012

Call me when they start firing 105mm

https://www.dawn.com/news/1503997

Well crap

https://mobile.twitter.com/guyverhofstadt/status/1170680111189901314

Omg Guy Verhofstadt also said that an extension was out of the question!!!

well wait, what's this bill do?

"Foreign Minister Le Drian is right: yet another extension for Brexit is unacceptable, unless the deadlock in London is broken. Let it be a 2nd ref., new elections, a revocation of art. 50 or the approval of the deal, but not today’s helpless status quo"

@Jokerfaic it blocks no deal by making it law that Boris has to ask for an extension

so making it law to further undermine democracy

Yup

can this bill get reviewed by a judge?

I'm not sure on that

especially in light of the now public knowledge that the EU won't extand

I'd say it's unconstitutional but we're in a constitutional grey area

so a bill outlining a PM request something that it is guaranteed won't be provided, surely its null

Well it only states that he has to ask for it, it doesn't say the EU has to give one so we could get no deal that way

honestly as soon as the split ocurrs, there needs to be some thorough and brutal ousting of counterproductive politicians

I mean dragging these cunts out of their offices by their wrists

Parliament needs to be cleaned out of the traitors definitely

They're now acting in their own interests instead of the country's

Hopefully Corban will also get the chop

The bill said that the PM must apply for an extension @Jokerfaic

That's it.

It's not unconstitutional. @James Rimor

Says you but like I said it's a grey area so 🤷

Sure it's a grey area. But nothing in the bill is unconstitutional

Telling the PM to do something isn't unconstitutional.

It's preventing a legal exit option set down by article 50

No it's not.

Article 50 does not say any specific way in which exiting is done.

Article 50 allows any country to leave according to their constitutional requirements.

Which that law is now a part of

Thus a constitutional requirement.

Nothing unconstitutional, nor illegal about that.

It also says a country can leave without a deal

it just sucks for a negotiation standpoint

Yeah, they can. @James Rimor

It also says we can extend and ask for more time.