Telling the PM to do something isn't unconstitutional.

It's preventing a legal exit option set down by article 50

No it's not.

Article 50 does not say any specific way in which exiting is done.

Article 50 allows any country to leave according to their constitutional requirements.

Which that law is now a part of

Thus a constitutional requirement.

Nothing unconstitutional, nor illegal about that.

It also says a country can leave without a deal

it just sucks for a negotiation standpoint

Yeah, they can. @James Rimor

It also says we can extend and ask for more time.

Which.. We are doing?

what is interesting at least is that the EU country leaders that support brexit are the ones that will likely follow suit and feel the same about the EU

so itll be a nice eye opener

but of course, EU probably cant have that and will want to suppress such things...

I don't know if any will follow suit tbh.

if they do, we know we made the right choice

We maybe asking for an extension but the law is blocking a legal part of article 50

Support for the EU has risen since Brexit started across the entire bloc

Except for like Greece

Switzerland too i believe

It's not. @James Rimor

The law doesn't 'block' anything.

also isnt the french president protested about like crazy and he's pro-EU

It simply requires the PM to ask for an extension.

@Boop / 브파 / C'thUwU Ehh, France is just France

They protest and protest.

We could lead to us never leaving without a deal...

Parliament would have to agree to it @James Rimor

Which wouldn't happen.

I think ive figured weez out

Parliament has to agree on any time that the EU offers.

Hes just contrairian tbh

Exactly which is why article 50 says we can leave without a damn deal!!!!

Hell just say the opposite to fet a reaction

A good devils advocate.

But if parliament blocks that option we get stuck in a never ending circle!

Contrarian i prefer tbh

Parliament won't block it though.

A dick more like