They weren't put in to power by us

The Shah was already in power

And then a new leader was elected

*selected

Where as the guy in power at the time got in to power after several people were assassinated, and then took emergency powers

Dude, even neocons in government don't make such shite excuses

Literally the shah was already in power xD

We didn't put him in power

they know what they did and sing it proudly

it was still a parlimentary monarchy xD

And while we were there, woman could go to school, people generally speaking had better lives

The people who took over didn't represent the people and just took advantage of the chaos

you are just all over a whore of the MIC establishment

this is sickening

You are making no argument, providing no evidence for your assertions, and saying things that are easily contradicted, and then resort to ad hominems

This is the same type of argument that always happens with these sorts of things, you just can't see it

You just assume we were really bad, when in reality when we were there, things were pretty good

I mean were things better while we were there, or when we pulled out and a dictator took over?

Was it better when woman could go to school and it was westernized, or when we pulled out?

You have to twist things a lot to say we should have let a dictator in power and they would have been better off with him in charge, when clearly when they took back over the country went to shit

>we need to stay in the middle east forever for their own good
>Iran, a country blockaded and sanctioned up the ass, is so much more of a threat than saudi arabia, a known terrorist funder that currently buys billions in american weaponry
>Iran government collapse is magically not the fault of the US government and CIA
what fucking argument need I make against such lunacy?

And you are being megagay. They are a #Democracy so they cannot be anyone's lapdog is literal nonsense.

It just betrays your senseless zealotry

Democracy good, democracy pure

Suadi Arabia has random private citizens that donate to terrorists, it's not the governmeant ,and even the sources provided will say that

Meanwhile iran literally provides over 100,000 missiles to hezbollah

God you are retarded

The most powerful terrorist group on the planet

I actually know what I'm talking about and read past the headline

random private citizens that somehow have the fincances and political clout to donate millions of dollars in a fucking stratified monarchy

leftists in the catholic church should be fired and actual conservative Christians should be put in

Yes, people in Suadi Arabia can make money and then donate it to whoever they want *le gasp*, they also have private business in Suadi Arabia

And it doesn't matter if the person even is a member of the royal family, they don't represent the whole governmeant, anymore than Hillary is representative of the U.S.'s support for qatar

If you donate money to terrorists in the US, you get arrested boi

whoever they want that the government approves of, lest it be an act of dissent, which is punished with death

If we find out about it

unless it's terrorists the US supports

The majority of terrorists use soviet weapons, like the ak-47

as do most dicators

And this most surprise some people, but the majority of dictators in the last 100 years have been socialist or communist

Becuase they are predominately responsible for many of the world's political problems