Can we save the insulting energy for the commies

Fuk it I'm going back to jerking off

And I'm insulting you because you are a fucking mongoltard who should've shut up because you have no knowledge of the source material

Did the nation it was sourced on, ever have the church behave in so utterly incompetent a manner that they brought nearly certain doom on the population for stupid reasons? And were they still thereafter unchallenged by any faction of the population?

@Gservator <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Also, I have seen a few quotes from "anarcho-capitalists: here over the last week
Holy shit, as an ancap, a lot of ancaps are insane larpers

@Miniature Menace yes

Example?

Look up the history of Romania

Example?

I'm jerking off now

I thought the whole meme about ancaps being okay with slavery was a strawman
But holy shit, some people who claim to be ancaps actually believe that shit

Who?

>TMI

@Nevis robots aren't people and therefore my sexbot cannot be a slave

You know what Gservator, I actually concede on Wallachia, because I suddenly remembered Vee exists.

I never said anything about robots

You said slavery

CNN thinks sexbots need human rights

@Nevis Who is okay with slavery and an ancap?

I would have to dig-oh

Or was it Vox

"Ancap"
I use the quotations for a reason

>"Ancap"
What did he mean by this?

I saw a few literal screenshots of shit like that in this chat a few days ago
Would have to dig to find it

seriously, though, are they like, self-described ancaps?

Yeah

Depends on the type of slavery really, voluntary servitude to pay off debt or crime wouldn't be the worst

I know some ancaps are larpy edgibois and like to play into the strawman meme for chuckles, and it can be difficult to know what people actually believe without context or tone

Even though
Like
Inherent self-ownership is a fundamental concept in ancap theory that I know of

TBH I disregard the idea of any silly poitical view being seriously held by anyone unless it's directly associated with someone using their actual identity. Otherwise it's probably a troll.

Voluntary servitude

There seem to be two general camps on this. One is that self-ownershop is non-transferable under any condition, and one that you can still *lease* out your services under contractual obligation, which could be argued to be equivalent to slavery in function, but would require that the contract is entered voluntarily at some point.

This is trade, not slavery

Historians would disagree

essentially, it's "slavery" after the same fashion as employment is "slavery"

Ancient Aztecs had this form of Slavery @Nevis

Perhaps define servitude as you mean it here

but the circumstance and conditions of it can be expanded to be pretty bad, depending on what's acceptable for terms of contract

To be certain we are referring to the same exact thing