Message from @Uksio

Discord ID: 616363696112795676


2019-08-28 20:07:05 UTC  

Why the hell would you put a reactor in a missile, anyway?

2019-08-28 20:07:06 UTC  

And the fallout is insignificant

2019-08-28 20:07:06 UTC  

A rocket that can fly out of the solar system at insane speed through nuclear decay

2019-08-28 20:07:11 UTC  

Nothing to worry about

2019-08-28 20:07:18 UTC  

so it could cruise indefinately

2019-08-28 20:07:24 UTC  

@Goodwood of Dank™ for propulsion

2019-08-28 20:07:34 UTC  

shoot it below radar all the way around the globe

2019-08-28 20:07:35 UTC  

no the fallout is insignificant, its meme factor is all

2019-08-28 20:07:45 UTC  

It's a waste of money and resources.

2019-08-28 20:07:48 UTC  

Well, not indefinitely, but it can fly for thousands of years, given that materials will hold up

2019-08-28 20:08:07 UTC  

Nuclear reactors are great at heating rocket fuel and this propelling the rocket to higher speeds than conventional means

2019-08-28 20:08:07 UTC  

lol so circling the globe for 1000s of yrs

2019-08-28 20:08:08 UTC  

but that does put into question, if the Ruskies are doing it in secret and it slipped up, who knowns what secrets Trump and China maybe hiding

2019-08-28 20:08:16 UTC  

You can send it in a different part of Solar System or even Milky Way

2019-08-28 20:08:26 UTC  

Basically

2019-08-28 20:08:37 UTC  

Nuclear powered cruise missiles are not a new thing

2019-08-28 20:08:47 UTC  

The US had a project of this type during the 50s

2019-08-28 20:09:01 UTC  

^

2019-08-28 20:09:04 UTC  

Exactly

2019-08-28 20:09:09 UTC  

that kind of weapon u could launch dozen of them from diff places on the planet and have them all convevge on a targe

2019-08-28 20:09:16 UTC  

They just deemed that " too dangerous and crazy"

2019-08-28 20:09:20 UTC  

They abandoned it during the early 60s because ICBMs became much more convenient

2019-08-28 20:09:24 UTC  

The words that mean nothing for russian

2019-08-28 20:09:33 UTC  

Denying out right that the US, which is still the most advanced military in the world, isn't doing any military research into this tech is a bit short-sighted imo

2019-08-28 20:09:33 UTC  

There was no need for such a weapon

2019-08-28 20:09:35 UTC  

those are two totally different concepts

2019-08-28 20:09:56 UTC  

"Nuklear roket you say? Too dangerous you say? Hold my vodka!"

2019-08-28 20:09:57 UTC  

The US may or may not be researching such a weapon

2019-08-28 20:10:05 UTC  

But the thing is that they don't need to

2019-08-28 20:10:21 UTC  

ICBMs are a hot commodity for any nuclear triad

2019-08-28 20:10:28 UTC  

imaging having 30 of those things sitting around in a bunker, they lauch them all one right a fter another and the missles just swarm a target

2019-08-28 20:10:38 UTC  

it's completely different from an ICBM

2019-08-28 20:10:44 UTC  

US missiles can reach any target on Earth in less than an hour

2019-08-28 20:10:56 UTC  

They really have nothing to worry about

2019-08-28 20:10:58 UTC  

@Andrew Popa 2.0 it is not about ICBMs any more
You are being way too short-sighted my friend

2019-08-28 20:10:59 UTC  

ICBMs aren't cruise missles

2019-08-28 20:11:05 UTC  

Trump has had an interest in the military industrial complex and he is R&Ding the Space Force so who knows lads
i put my bets on yes he is researching nuclear powered tech

2019-08-28 20:11:08 UTC  

you see an ICBM immediately

2019-08-28 20:11:18 UTC  

heat signature

2019-08-28 20:11:25 UTC  

you don't see a cruise missle

2019-08-28 20:11:41 UTC  

Well it is rather stupid to put so many resources into a weapon of this sorts