Message from @Weez
Discord ID: 616399749708251136
public ownership of schools
I don't need to name one that shouldn't none should be that means none should be.
its the Hassenfeld conspiracy all over again
Public ownership of infrastructure
To name a few
if monopolies rise then encourage competition
not that simple
lmao
it is much easier than safely and intelligently breaking up companies
how do you encourage competition in a monopoly?
its just a ploy to outrage voters against corporatism.
educate us
Education, funding, tax rebates
all things the monopoly can beat
easily
Go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200
lol
they'll hire the best workers through better pay
funding to what scale?
and so be it
if they want to do that
then they can do that
tax rebates aint going to do jack
When Google doesn't even show up your product
but if they can't compete in the consumer market, which is to say provide a product consumers will buy at a price they accept, the company will fail.
This is what your street looks like when there’s no monopoly on hanging cables

monopolies are only bad if it is impossible to compete
Just ask Intel
Yes, because the monopolies can beat them.
BECAUSE they're a monopoly
This is basic fucking economics
You spend your money destroying the competition, rather than innovating
Though I'm not sure why I'd expect people on here to understand that
active manipulation, backdoor deals, anticompetitive deals are bad - and already illegal
giant companies have fallen many times
monopolies are anticompetitive due to scale
Monopoly with competition doesn't sound what weez referred to at all?
and market influence they have
you can't stop that
meanwhile your competition comes up to speed ... you spend your money on the soulless "journalists" who will say and do anything for that sweet sweet greenback