Then KEEP the HAMMEROING going

Broadly speaking there’s two kinds:
1) Adults attracted to prepubescent children
2) Adults attracted to sexually mature, yet underage, children.

We can deter type 2). They’re not crazy, they’re just bad. I believe they can be re-educated because. At the end of the day they aren’t broken. You’re supposed to be sexually attracted to sexually mature humans. But, since we live so long now, “childhood” has been lengthened into sexual maturity and that requires restraint on the part of adults. These sexually mature yet underage children don’t know better. Adults should know know better. We can *make* these adults know better.

Type 1) is a little trickier. They aren’t bad, they’re legit crazy. You aren’t supposed to be attracted to prepubescent children. They’re broken in a way that can’t be deterred and can’t be fixed. We we find them, life in prison without the possibility of parole should be the only sentence. With capital punishment (if your state allows it).

https://tenor.com/K7ho.gif

gematrinator

@ManAnimal That's pretty edgy, NGL

Wall o text

Apologies

I don't qualify No .2 as 'pedo' although under the law, there is no difference between these two

Wait

You mean you don’t qualify no1 or no2 as pedo?

this is much like the trap question in that if you perceive a trap as female and are attracted to wht u think is female, not exactl homo. same with mature looking but underage

No. 2's more of an attraction to sexual maturity, but yeah, still pedo as fuck

@spooky ducc gematria

Or underage-looking but mature @ManAnimal

2) is wrong. But not crazy.
1) is wrong and crazy.

iie. she can look older than she is

Yeah, there was this one anime with mechs and shit, where one character's like...14, but looks 16-18

and on the other hand, there's Lucky Star

the MC of Lucky Star's like...18, and she looks 10

nutty that nationalists be supportin' the crown o'er parliament
**we truly do live in a society, innit bruv**

If you have someone over 18 that looks like an 8 year old. That’s not a rule 1/2 violation. It’s probably a rule 4 violation.

If they are over 18 but look like a 14 year old... meh? Depends what you’re attracted to I guess. You can start looking sexually mature at 14.

Gurren Lagann, that's the one.

pedo is about being attracted to children because they are children not sexual mature; you don't want to label a guy that sleeps with someone who is 17 and he doesn't teven know it despite technically the law making no distinction

As long as they’re really over 18 and the fact that they “look younger” isn’t what you’re attracted to it’s fine.

Ask for ID

If you aren’t sure, ask.

doesn'tt work

fake id

i knew a guy who met a girl at a bar

@spooky ducc are you a HIM, if you don;t mind me asking

That can happen. Sure.
Still ask. Do you due diligence.

slept with her; the dad charged him for rape

cause she was jailbait

the law didn't care about the fake id

the law only cared about the adult acting inapproriately with the child

well ive got bad news for you buckeroo!! or good depending on your perspective 😉

@Scale_e Yeah, it goes into a gray area of sorts when you get to dudes who go through precocious puberty
(Not sure if females who go into precocious puberty look older than they are, or if it's just a male thing)
https://www.thecut.com/2019/01/precocious-puberty-patrick-burleigh.html
The dude I'm using as an example (in this picture) looked 20, despite being 14.

ding ding ding ding we have a winner ladies and gentle men

https://tenor.com/vyCz.gif

fuck off jordan