there is a trade-off; if one is LIBEL then they can censor; cause it is their ass

FUCK YOU GIVE ME BOIPUSSY

instead of operating a platform.

i dont have a boipussy

YOU HAVE TO EARN HIM

i know someone that does thp

There is entirely too much faggotry in here.

@Lucienne d'Anwyl I think meows earned a feet pic from you

wouldnt you agree

@ManAnimal ask him, hes the tightest ive ever seen

if one is NOT libel, they CANNOT censor; this is the way it normally works WITHOUT Sect 230

@Goodwood of Dank™ and now there's infinitely more because you're here paypig

meowzers hasnt spoken on here in weeks

he isn't even on here afaik

And?

he won't return my messages <:why:462286147473637407>

let the meme die

if they are treated like platforms, then they will be libel for what they print which would drive them out of business

Didn't he get banninated?

See luci.. You made the poor kid kill himself

<:banhammer:509427162009567245>

i think you're just misunderstanding something or perhaps i am @ManAnimal but revoking the protection of section 230 for Twitter, google and FB would not destroy the internet or ruin its efficacy

oof

and no platforms are different

It would certainly destroy the internet..

Well, most user interaction websites

destroying the internet is rad actually and i support it

Luci's just a lesbian Wookiee. Economics aren't her strong suit.

no not really, because all they have to do is not edit their site unless there is a court order

Okay, boomer paypig

>femoids
>in my GAMER SERVER

@UnScottable, a 'publish' can publish a book and is not libel for the content of a particular author they publish; this is the way it worked for decades before the internet

yeah fuck this curse humanity has brought upon itself

the fuck are you insulting my economics for you fucking kike @Goodwood of Dank™

>implying there are any on this server

Kek.

i have said nothing about money

@Lucienne d'Anwyl you are a femoid and thus know nothing about economics

learn to read faggot

Goodwood.. I really hope you shit your pants at the most inopportune moment

Removing 203 would mean that the websites would be responsible for what users post