If its because I don't like it then that's where we have a problem

well yes, you incur consequences to your action

further, children don't have free speech

of speaking

This is something I'm big on

but it should be socially regulated and not law

and women don't have free speech in a man's sphere of influence

Children don't and should not have freedom

if you go into a black neighborhood and call people niggers, you should not be surprised if you get murdered

likewise, subordinates don't have free speech when the bosses are around

Is MA speaking in effective terms?

childen arent free because they arent mature enough to consent credible

Yes he is

i think that is an important distinction

im saying Free by law and government

It is in some extent also legal

free speech is only possible with a degree of compartmentalization

what people do about speech they dont like is their buisness

For example in the army you don't have free speech, imao

otherwise, children will be used as a 'screen'

exactly, samaritan

women are always used by the weak as a 'screen' in an attempt to discredit the rules or the ruler

free speech to the point where you cannot be punished by the law

negative

thats all

im on the side of

Once again I bring up the army

free speech NEVER guarenteed lack of punishment

only lack of PREVENTION

BY THE LAW

by the law..

read you history

its not unlawful for a private company to fire you for shit you said

thats fine

the law cannot PREVENT you from speaking

it CAN punish for speech

Well...

this is what the first ammendment actually provided

Companies should tax their employees as a sort of micro state

Even worse

i..e. no law can be passed saying, "if you say 1, 2 is the penalty"