Message from @Samaritan
Discord ID: 621176413386571786
if not 2020
Like with how far they have gone I struggle to imagine where they can take it
But they'll find a way
Free as in anyone can say what they want
2016 level sperg is now 0
incorrect
or rather inacccurate
though some level of common sense restriction can be fine
pre-emptive is not the same as taking actions in response to
Look at the motivation behind restriction
thats the main thing
and you are never free from the consequences of your actions.. NOR your speech
the intention of the restrictions is whats sour
If its because I don't like it then that's where we have a problem
well yes, you incur consequences to your action
further, children don't have free speech
of speaking
This is something I'm big on
but it should be socially regulated and not law
and women don't have free speech in a man's sphere of influence
if you go into a black neighborhood and call people niggers, you should not be surprised if you get murdered
likewise, subordinates don't have free speech when the bosses are around
Is MA speaking in effective terms?
childen arent free because they arent mature enough to consent credible
Yes he is
i think that is an important distinction
im saying Free by law and government
It is in some extent also legal
free speech is only possible with a degree of compartmentalization
what people do about speech they dont like is their buisness
For example in the army you don't have free speech, imao
otherwise, children will be used as a 'screen'
exactly, samaritan
women are always used by the weak as a 'screen' in an attempt to discredit the rules or the ruler
free speech to the point where you cannot be punished by the law
negative
thats all
im on the side of
Once again I bring up the army
free speech NEVER guarenteed lack of punishment