assault rifle

does it have to be either all pacifism or all war? ;P ...

PewDiePie is becoming lame

No

cant it just be peace at most costs

A system of all war might produce strong indivoduals

Pacifism is retarded though

But would lead to societal stagnation

War is bad

And this replacement by a better managed people eventually

There where literally people in the UK saying surrender to the Germens because war bad

pacifism is stupid

War is bad so is teeth falling out

Same thing happened during the cold war

War is a tool that mustn't be overly feared

But it isn't a lifestyle either

"Therefore all doctrines which postulate peace at all costs are incompatible with Fascism. "

War is bad, but sometimes it is necessary

War is good

True but I don't care what is incompatible with fascism

There is probably cost to peace that shouldn't be paid

Sometimes, good people have to do bad things to prevent bad people from doing bad things to good people.

I wonder who they where considering when they wrote that

Sometimes bad people have to do good things* nobody in war is good.

Although if you look from specie perspective nations are irrelevant but then that's illiberal af

Because I don't think it was actual pacifists as since when have they been in actual charge of anything

In war, some people are still better than others

he was talking about socialists prior to that paragraph

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTXaCL16Wik&feature=youtu.be

War is complicated and messy but I think there is such thing as a moral war

Well

People who use shotguns in trenches > people who use mustard gas while complaining about shotguns

Moral war *is* bad

Really really bad

Worse than ruthless war by far

War isn't supposed to be morak

Making it so

I mean as in justification

You know what that does?

I think dresden deserved it

Being nice to the enemy?