For the (((free))) version?

btw, Nord has basically no lag

Yes

the Free version

The (((Free)))

Version.

>the zip file is 549MB

fucking hell

oh n/m, yall cheap nigs .... you get what you pay for

I mean, I've got like 4gb of porn in a folder

so it's not all THAT bad

maybe I'll terrorize Luci's server

Over a few hours..

Not the best though

Send me a link

TBF, I spent the last 30 minutes hauling shit upstairs

it's not really ginna be terror when ur posting on a porn server

some of it is inflation porn

and by some, I mean over 1900 pages

hello

https://metro.co.uk/2019/07/27/police-find-frankenstein-human-womans-head-sewn-onto-male-body-10472713/

Is this the general chat?

no, this is the krusty krab

the main general is <#598761542200197120>

tho this can be used as a general as well when there's not loads of new folks arriving

ohai Discordia.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/15624-cooking-climate-consensus-data-97-of-scientists-affirm-agw-debunked

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#6aae8fd83f9f

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

NASA>Forbes

https://realclimatescience.com/2017/01/earth-cooling-at-the-fastest-rate-on-record/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

M * V=P * Y

NASA beats all your articles, even your article from Forbes contradicts it’s self

you're an ideologue who trusts the government

you also can't read or interpret graphs

watch this vide in full jam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

then we can have this argument again

Yeah I’m the ideologue when you can’t even read and interpret your own article and also someone who thinks a physicist hold more authority on climate change than actual climate scientists.

I bet you $5 dollars you can't explain the difference between anthropogenic climate model and the actual greenhouse effect