Message from @Tonight at 11 - DOOM

Discord ID: 618092374978986004


2019-09-02 14:34:41 UTC  

interesting

2019-09-02 14:35:12 UTC  

@Ethreen42 an autocratic libertarian

2019-09-02 14:35:34 UTC  

>autocratic
>libertarian

2019-09-02 14:35:55 UTC  

is this some gay Pinochet shit

2019-09-02 14:36:00 UTC  

I’d rather UKIP win if it was still relevant.

2019-09-02 14:36:12 UTC  

and I'd like to own a unicorn

2019-09-02 14:36:29 UTC  

my bs about the Queen taking over is more realistic then Ukip in power

2019-09-02 14:36:30 UTC  

tbh

2019-09-02 14:36:45 UTC  

ukip is deader than dead

2019-09-02 14:36:53 UTC  

vote against voting!

2019-09-02 14:36:55 UTC  

👑

2019-09-02 14:36:58 UTC  

But it ain’t, so something new should take its place. The tories are traitors, labor are literal communists, libdems are just closet laborers, NF and the BNP are no good, so

2019-09-02 14:37:28 UTC  

yeah but it's pretty difficult to break out of the two-party system with FPTP

2019-09-02 14:37:41 UTC  

this is cringe complaining

2019-09-02 14:37:48 UTC  

you want a political movement

2019-09-02 14:37:51 UTC  

go build it

2019-09-02 14:37:55 UTC  

faggit

2019-09-02 14:38:02 UTC  

just join GI or something @Gespa

2019-09-02 14:38:11 UTC  

I think that the country should be ruled by a military dictaorship

2019-09-02 14:38:21 UTC  

One which should enforce the bill of rights

2019-09-02 14:38:25 UTC  

Under the Queen @Lucienne d'Anwyl

2019-09-02 14:38:26 UTC  

But that's just me

2019-09-02 14:38:36 UTC  

Monarchs are the opposite of efficiency

2019-09-02 14:38:45 UTC  

they are not there to be efficient

2019-09-02 14:38:47 UTC  

You'd have people being decided by hereditary instead of talent

2019-09-02 14:39:03 UTC  

The leader of the dictatorship should be the greatest in the military

2019-09-02 14:39:06 UTC  

The highest rank

2019-09-02 14:39:14 UTC  

Can’t build a movement if I don’t live in the country, so

2019-09-02 14:39:23 UTC  

It’s just complaining to some degree, true.

2019-09-02 14:39:24 UTC  

so why do you even care?

2019-09-02 14:39:26 UTC  

never in history one single entity was able to be efficient, self-reflective enough or unbiased

2019-09-02 14:39:27 UTC  

what country you in @Gespa

2019-09-02 14:39:31 UTC  

are you even a britbong?

2019-09-02 14:39:43 UTC  

Be it monarchs, popes or communist party

2019-09-02 14:40:26 UTC  

I mean, absolute monarchies of Europe used to be quite a bit more efficient then the feudal, more decentralized systems of before...

2019-09-02 14:40:33 UTC  

You need several parties in competition for a healthy political scale balancing.
The only way it seems to really work in practice.

2019-09-02 14:40:40 UTC  

US, and no.
But the politics of the UK influences the US as much as it does vice versa. The political shifts of the entire west are relevant to the entire west going forward. If you think otherwise, you’re retarded.

2019-09-02 14:40:44 UTC  

but again: I don advocate for a monarch for the virtue of efficiency

2019-09-02 14:41:23 UTC  

Only some kind of consensus seeking provides a self-balancing, responsible, accountable and fair-ish process

2019-09-02 14:41:30 UTC  

The king's job is not to be the most competent

2019-09-02 14:41:44 UTC  

his job is to hire the most competent ppl and make sure they don steal shit