@Monstrous Moonshine can you provide the article where mr Turkheimer says that?

to try to bootstrap the example using Japan, social cohesion was a function of the values of the society which by large part revolved around the emperor. that idea was deeply ingrained into the society and the entire structure that supported it had to be destroyed for that to change. they literally has to build a new nation with a new set of core values

revolved around the emperor?

the fuck

ya we totally changed everything about them... they only kept like 10%... then put ultra emphasis on that 10% which is why they went relativey crazy :p

you're really ignorant you dipshit

but thats cultural.. not social

Because conveniently enougj I went over to his Researchgate profile

socialy we advanced them at lightspeed

And according to Researchgate he never published an article with that title

one can't remain without the other; social cohesion is what kept the country together and that culture was it's source

Japan maybe centerd around the emperor in like 500 AD

remove that cohesion, and the structure starts to implode

Japan's culture was to always be at war with itself

Then we westerners arrived and fucked that all up

as with Rome, the Visigoth conquest was just the final nail in the coffin. it was the internal divisions which truly destroyed Rome

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXgWvFd16iI roomer hours

We ruined their culture

Lol

in america.. your social cohesion is 'im a fucking american'... your cultural shit is a basket full of scrambled eggs

Rome failed because the leaders kept squabbling

used to be

that is under attack

why is the EU just where failed politicians go to fuck up the continent

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eric_Turkheimer/2#research-items

cause they can?

"under attack"

I have never heard such ignorant shit

Most americans don't give a rats ass about being american, never have

Again I've found no mention of such an article in his Researchgate profile

two points of contention: No. 1) Psychology = soft science; 2) just because someone researches a topic doesn't make it a 'field of study'

@JackH670 btw if i was ruler of the world... i would remain in eu... and fix eu... but since thats never gonna happen.. im pro brexit... and hopefully us leaving is enough for them 2 sort their shit out... then maybe we can rejoin later... but only after their sort their shit out

otherwise, gender studies...

Psychology is a statistical science

Not a soft science you eugenicist nazi boomer prick

"behavioral geneticist" is just shy of alchemy

before there was chemistry

@nim.bm Why would you let the EU exist if you already ruled the world? That's just creating a challenge to your authority.

remain and reform is impossible

🤷

researching a subject can absolutely be their field of study, i mean research is study