<:coolgon:549370575701803019>

more like if you want to kill and slaugher a pig you will need a pointy stick and a flint blade

It’s natural but even if you don’t agree. Boom god

Get rekt

Guns are an extrapolation of the human right to self defense.

And I like thaaaat I like that ultimate checkmate.

It’s the only way we combat our free speech being taken and shit guys

Because they believe in these things that aren’t real and don’t exist

exactly. the right is not just to its most privative form, but also, all developments along that line, especially if you can make them yourself

The commies and shiz

The radical leftists

you do not need god to win that argument, ifcast everything you can do without resorting to it will be much better.

I doubt that

I’m not a super religious person even. But I can tell you these kinds of people are beyond reason in our government and etc

to resort to gods name is to expect him to fight your battles for you. god is neither servant or soldier. carry your own philosophical back pack.

I would have been a great preacher lol

I have no issue with relying on tradition because it’s worked and got us here. Some messes made along the way yes... but that always happens

God is a subjective answer, if someone believes it effective. But if someone even just has doubts than it harms your argument. It's always better to base your argument in observable reality

It’s an integral part

And they use subjective answers to reason

The radical leftists

i have no issue with tradition until in conflicts with other things like natural rights.

And they sound like drooling morons as a result

Dude... the natural rights are a tradition that was started

So I mean relatively new... but your still appealing to something that’s 300ish years old

And is backed up by the very existence of the west

Observable reality

So yes we use reality against them but when it fails

and it will.

What have we got left eh? To guide us. I think we can use both things

You can have the morals of a religion without the tradition

a tradition can interfere with a natural right, and when it does it has to lose. because without the fundaments of natural righters there is no basis to protect the individual against the collective.

I refuse to concede the rock with which the house has its foundation

The left will gladly take what they can of that rock my friend

The rock could use a little sculpting

natural rights are the rock, for without them there is no tradition but the mobs tradition

And the rights are guaranteed not just by reason

But yes a spaghetti monster

It’s ok dude lol

To me I’m fine with that

I feel like a lot of people just dislike their parents and they were religious so they are adverse to religion but I could be wrong. To me it’s not really something I’m so adverse too