ummmm
colonialism begets genocidal/authoritarian (worst/best) behavior, and that's bad for the humans on the receiving end
half of these sources just link back to the article itself
like
reconquesta is bad right?
oh I think he left
oops
Yeah that wiki article is half hearsay
holy fuck, and it says he "supported" Reagan's SDI
umm, bullshit, he fucking AUTHORED IT
Amazon has adds on the radio here all the time for 15-something and bennies entry-level. Not great but a mortgage here costs less than renting a studio on the coast so not bad for a young man starting out.
yeah, this is fucking doctored
Immediately after saying he shilled anti-Reagan conspiracies
and OH LOOK, WHAT DO WE HAVE HERE
A FUCKING HERITAGE FOUNDATION SOURCE
lol heritage foundation
slimey teapartiers got their mitts all over this already
@Jym >starting out
exactly right
nothing more
Except Wikipedia has a very extensive review process
The tea party couldnt just log in and tamper with it
Yeah man it's a radio add. Generally that's for entry-level shit. If you have a resume you use a service.
except wikipedia is also publicly funded, and the heritage foundation is none too shy about donations
fuck the media
A friend of mine got kicked off wikipedias editing list for a misspelling
oof
@Greyson W. (YouTube Channel): i don't give a shit - fuck the natives, as a Romanian, I say the western Europeans did nothing wrong
what do you have to do for that
your friend probably wasn't rich
I mean
Smallpox did most of the leg work
@breadmoth So you have no problem being conquered yourself right? It would just demonstrate the weakness of your people?
the savages needed the western Europeans
yeah, for real, colonists weren't biological warfare experts
"needed" disease lol
apathy, not malice
Just because western europe ended up being the best conquerors doesnt mean its bad
@Greyson W. (YouTube Channel) i am a Romanian , not a nigger , or a redman so I ---DON'T GIVE.... A FUCK
So that's a yes lol
the weak deserve to be conquered
