Message from @snake
Discord ID: 639796338296356865
harelip
That's not a harelip. That's either a lip curled in a sneer, or a really fucking short upper lip.
We don't need that as an emoji, we need the smaller face version
To be posted in response to libtards.
What happened to paleocons aren't nazis, dude?
And, yeah, you spam my DMs, I leak my DMs. Because your DMs are my DMs.
(And you do the same anyway.)
But please keep complaining that I equate paleocons and ethnonationalists to nazis... as if you (and I) don't similarly equate anarchocommunism, anarchosyndicalism and libertarian socialism to "communists". We are just sick and tired of your tiny differences to care to be autistically accurate at this point.
LMAO
I like him not because I agree with him on every single one of his views, but because of his extensive knowledge of philosophy
Nietzschean philosophy in particular
Well I don’t know the differences between anarcho communism and libertarian socialism because it probably is a small difference. But equating a ethnonat to a Nazi is retarded because Nazis are completely different
Nazis think jews are inferior and that Atlantis was a lesson on why not to breed with Jews
They actually believed Atlantis was a German civilization that collapsed because the gods punished them for being liberal
The Nazis believed crazy shit like that so I wouldn’t compare the two but if you want to whatever
Not to mention that the vast majority of people who fought literal Nazis would themselves be considered "White Nationalists" today
There was a survey in 1943, at the height of the war, where 90% of Americans said they'd rather lose the war than end segregation
Chapter 3, page 81
Or the founding fathers
Every president up until JFK was a white nationalist
So 1960’s
But, this is all American history, I wouldn’t expect a Finn to know about it
> The circumstance of Superior beauty, is thought worthy attention in the propagation of our horses, dogs, and other domestic animals; why not in that of man?
- Thomas Jefferson on Whites
So much for Nazism @Monstrous Moonshine
People agreed with us back in 1776
This Reductio ad Hitlerum is a convenient strategy to fall back to
To generate a visceral reaction
And relies on feelings than facts
It’s such a easy claim to blow out of the water, our beliefs are older than communism.
Also I don’t like Richard
I’m much more of a Nick Fuentes guy even though he’s a paleo con
Because unlike Richard, Nick is actually advancing
In other news, Crowder did a much better job than Kirk
Yeah he was afraid
That’s probably what made him more sober about how to respond
The last thing he said, "we don't all have to be like the left, we don't have to follow lockstep and silence people we disagree with" a) showed a lot of awareness to the question as a groyper question and b) is a dig at Charlie Kirk