from your lips to god's ears

if republicans handle this right, they will demolish the democrats for a decade to come. if they don't, the republican party will lose, pretty much forever

legalizing 30Million people tends to til tehe vote a bit

Louie is right the clown decade is upon us

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORN19LkcpL8

what the fuck

how is that triggering

I know that the US politics current state might be feeding my paranoia but this Tulsi Gabbard and Hillary scene seems to be a bit too convenient to me.

Is the any chance that Hillary is playing the evil witch of the woods in attempt to make Trump lose? Knowing how much Trump base hates her she has a lot of power over them, she coul push and push making candidate like Gabbard appear to be someone they might consider voting.

possibly, but I personally find that to be unlikely, considering 99% of trump voters are just gonna vote for trump

Maybe but this is early days still on the elections. It would make a very good narrative if she was to 'fight' with Hillary, push forward and get in the primaries and then be a Democratic candidate who would would be votable to Conservatives.

All you would need after that is to tarnish Trump even more while having the Gabbard run 'rogue' and try to call for decency and respect and give Trump some small amounts of respect.

Democrats would be flinging shit at Trump, never trumpers would get annoying and loud and boom Gabbard who was target of no ones flinging emerges victorious.

Best part of this that it does not rely on altruism of Hillary, just her hate of Trump as woman scorned.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1074241
Great job Trump. Very cool!

Your cybersecurity adviser cannot unlock his own phone.

https://uproxx.com/culture/rick-perry-misunderstood-energy-secretary-job/

Great job Trump. Very cool.

Replacing a PhD nuclear scientist with someone with a degree in animal husbandry in the position that oversees American nuclear weapons.

https://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/01/19/record-rick-perry-wants-succeed-two-physicists-energy-chief/96762042/

> A nuclear physicist currently holds the role, and a Nobel Prize-winning physicist held the job before that. Perry's background is a bit different: He studied animal husbandry at Texas A&M. He also once frolicked to the “Green Acres” theme on TV's “Dancing with the Stars.”

"Some have pointed out that Perry acknowledged that the Energy Secretary oversees America’s nuclear arsenal in a statement on the day he accepted the job, which would of course dispute the New York Times’ assertion that he didn’t know the full scope of the role.

“It is a tremendous honor to be selected to serve as Secretary of Energy by President-elect Trump. I am deeply humbled by his trust in me,” Perry said that day. “As the former governor of the nation’s largest energy producing state, I know American energy is critical to our economy and our security. I look forward to engaging in a conversation about the development, stewardship and regulation of our energy resources, safeguarding our *nuclear arsenal*, and promoting an American energy policy that creates jobs and puts America first.”"

if only liberals could read to the end of the article LOL

Or read past the headline

or think for themselves

You're missing the main point LOL

> A big chunk of the Energy secretary’s job involves upkeep of America’s nuclear arsenal, as the New York Times reported, a focus requiring two-thirds of the department’s $30 billion budget. A nuclear physicist currently holds the role, and a Nobel Prize-winning physicist held the job before that.

> Perry's background is a bit different: He studied animal husbandry at Texas A&M. He also once frolicked to the “Green Acres” theme on TV's “Dancing with the Stars.”

Replacing a nuclear scientist with somone who has a degree in animal husbandry. Who will oversee Americas nuclear aresenal <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

If only "conservatives" could think.

So, it's not that he will just oversee nuclear stuff. He'll oversee a lot of stuff, including some nuclear.
By that logic, a nuclear scientists would make the best admiral, since there are nuclear reactors on some vessels.

>He ignores the fact that it's a majority of his job

<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

>He ignores the fact that someone with a degree in animal husbandry shouldn't be in this position regardless

<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

Okay, you got me. That was a good troll.

>majority of the job
says who? NYT?

It definitely doesn't hurt for the person to have more insight, but these jobs are management jobs first and foremost.

Ah yes, I'm sure his degree in animal husbandry will help him in that role <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

Imagine being so deluded as to actually trying to defend this.

Are you going to tell me that the cybersecurity advisor is okay as well? The one that cannot open his own phone.

Advisors should know their stuff.
Management people should likewise.

The energy secretary's main job is not to oversee nuclear weapons, this is the job literally of the military, with their nuclear people. Furthermore this is a job for politics, and not a job that requires extensive technical expertise, let alone in nuclear matters, given that it's about broad energy policies and not about specific nuclear information

Glad we agree that these two people shouldn't be in their positions then.

And management is about managing other people, that is what matters most.