Message from @Tiberius

Discord ID: 640627882758242334


2019-11-03 19:03:22 UTC  

Through the expansion of cellular networks?

2019-11-03 19:03:29 UTC  

:brainlet:

2019-11-03 19:03:39 UTC  

Cellular networks dont work in shasta area

2019-11-03 19:03:51 UTC  

Neither does HAM without the repeaters, your point?

2019-11-03 19:03:52 UTC  

I used to drive through there 2-3 times a week when I drove rigs

2019-11-03 19:04:10 UTC  

So we have two systems which don't work without repeaters in the wild

2019-11-03 19:04:10 UTC  

1/3 of the I-5 is not covered by cellular networks

2019-11-03 19:04:16 UTC  

And thats just the I5

2019-11-03 19:04:27 UTC  

Thats not getting out into wilderness areas

2019-11-03 19:04:46 UTC  

One system (Ham) has less people using it every year and then we have another system (cellular) which has an increase in the amount of people using it

2019-11-03 19:04:55 UTC  

And you wonder why they're replacing HAM with cellular?

2019-11-03 19:05:04 UTC  

Luddies like you would keep us in the past.

2019-11-03 19:05:34 UTC  

The point being that the HAM radio infrastructure is already there and its going to cost more to replace and maintain it with cellular

2019-11-03 19:05:53 UTC  

Aging infrastructure you mean?

2019-11-03 19:05:53 UTC  

"The state cant afford to maintain the HAM repeaters"

2019-11-03 19:06:00 UTC  

Which will need to be replaced and upgraded eventually?

2019-11-03 19:06:05 UTC  

"The state should modernize no matter the cost"

2019-11-03 19:06:12 UTC  

So why not modernize it?

2019-11-03 19:06:18 UTC  

Rather than keeping an ancient system in place

2019-11-03 19:06:19 UTC  

Upgrading and replacing done at owner expense

2019-11-03 19:06:29 UTC  

Because thats their radio towers

2019-11-03 19:07:17 UTC  

HAM radios also suffer less interference in emergency situations and poor conditions in my experience

2019-11-03 19:07:51 UTC  

> Therefore, the Department no longer financially supports HAM operators radios or tenancy

2019-11-03 19:07:53 UTC  

🤷

2019-11-03 19:08:13 UTC  

Again, they've decided to replace an old, dated system with something newer

2019-11-03 19:08:17 UTC  

Shut the fuck up, commie EU shill.

2019-11-03 19:08:29 UTC  

Nobody wants the opinion you Googled.

2019-11-03 19:09:16 UTC  

"The cost to the state is nothing the operators repair and replace these towers at their own cost and do not make money from their operation."

2019-11-03 19:09:18 UTC  

Weez, go back to <#622430373791662110> or <#622430298746912768> where you belong.

2019-11-03 19:09:55 UTC  

"These radios have been used dozens of times to protect life and property when public communications have broken down and failed."

2019-11-03 19:10:27 UTC  

And they can be replaced with a more modern system which is more accessible 🤷

2019-11-03 19:10:38 UTC  

IE, cellular.

2019-11-03 19:11:33 UTC  

The fucking Cal-Fire prepardness brochure instructs people to keep handheld radios and scanners you hack.

2019-11-03 19:11:44 UTC  

It isnt in thos areas tho

2019-11-03 19:12:25 UTC  

You dont have wildfires and hundreds of thousands of square miles of rough terrain where you live so I wouldnt expect you to actually understand.

2019-11-03 19:13:04 UTC  

No I don't, just have an understanding of radio waves and technological change.

2019-11-03 19:13:17 UTC  

Evidently you dont

2019-11-03 19:14:51 UTC  

For cellular to work even just in the shasta area and provide the same coverage that HAM operators provide to emergency services (for free as covered in your own source) they would have to have a cell tower on every mountaintop and in every valley throughout the shasta, sisikyou, ashlands, and grants pass area

2019-11-03 19:15:01 UTC  

Cellular has a higher range compared to those low power HAM sets.

2019-11-03 19:15:01 UTC  

All of which comes at the direct expense of the state

2019-11-03 19:15:20 UTC  

Those arent low power HAM sets