Message from @Tiberius

Discord ID: 640627731188547584


2019-11-03 18:58:51 UTC  

What's wrong with that?

2019-11-03 19:00:51 UTC  

Why are you mad that the state won't subsidies your hobby anymore?

2019-11-03 19:01:27 UTC  

Did you even read the rest of that document

2019-11-03 19:02:30 UTC  

The 14 examples of it being used?

2019-11-03 19:02:55 UTC  

If you want to have a debate with me fine but don't go quote mining to satisfy your bullshit confirmation bias, that was the example email used in a document talking about how such measure would devestate their ability to respond to emergencies both fire and rescue related

2019-11-03 19:03:16 UTC  

Those capabilities which are being replaced?

2019-11-03 19:03:22 UTC  

Through the expansion of cellular networks?

2019-11-03 19:03:29 UTC  

:brainlet:

2019-11-03 19:03:39 UTC  

Cellular networks dont work in shasta area

2019-11-03 19:03:51 UTC  

Neither does HAM without the repeaters, your point?

2019-11-03 19:03:52 UTC  

I used to drive through there 2-3 times a week when I drove rigs

2019-11-03 19:04:10 UTC  

So we have two systems which don't work without repeaters in the wild

2019-11-03 19:04:10 UTC  

1/3 of the I-5 is not covered by cellular networks

2019-11-03 19:04:16 UTC  

And thats just the I5

2019-11-03 19:04:27 UTC  

Thats not getting out into wilderness areas

2019-11-03 19:04:46 UTC  

One system (Ham) has less people using it every year and then we have another system (cellular) which has an increase in the amount of people using it

2019-11-03 19:04:55 UTC  

And you wonder why they're replacing HAM with cellular?

2019-11-03 19:05:04 UTC  

Luddies like you would keep us in the past.

2019-11-03 19:05:34 UTC  

The point being that the HAM radio infrastructure is already there and its going to cost more to replace and maintain it with cellular

2019-11-03 19:05:53 UTC  

Aging infrastructure you mean?

2019-11-03 19:05:53 UTC  

"The state cant afford to maintain the HAM repeaters"

2019-11-03 19:06:00 UTC  

Which will need to be replaced and upgraded eventually?

2019-11-03 19:06:05 UTC  

"The state should modernize no matter the cost"

2019-11-03 19:06:12 UTC  

So why not modernize it?

2019-11-03 19:06:18 UTC  

Rather than keeping an ancient system in place

2019-11-03 19:06:19 UTC  

Upgrading and replacing done at owner expense

2019-11-03 19:06:29 UTC  

Because thats their radio towers

2019-11-03 19:07:17 UTC  

HAM radios also suffer less interference in emergency situations and poor conditions in my experience

2019-11-03 19:07:51 UTC  

> Therefore, the Department no longer financially supports HAM operators radios or tenancy

2019-11-03 19:07:53 UTC  

🤷

2019-11-03 19:08:13 UTC  

Again, they've decided to replace an old, dated system with something newer

2019-11-03 19:08:17 UTC  

Shut the fuck up, commie EU shill.

2019-11-03 19:08:29 UTC  

Nobody wants the opinion you Googled.

2019-11-03 19:09:16 UTC  

"The cost to the state is nothing the operators repair and replace these towers at their own cost and do not make money from their operation."

2019-11-03 19:09:18 UTC  

Weez, go back to <#622430373791662110> or <#622430298746912768> where you belong.

2019-11-03 19:09:55 UTC  

"These radios have been used dozens of times to protect life and property when public communications have broken down and failed."

2019-11-03 19:10:27 UTC  

And they can be replaced with a more modern system which is more accessible 🤷

2019-11-03 19:10:38 UTC  

IE, cellular.

2019-11-03 19:11:33 UTC  

The fucking Cal-Fire prepardness brochure instructs people to keep handheld radios and scanners you hack.

2019-11-03 19:11:44 UTC  

It isnt in thos areas tho

2019-11-03 19:12:25 UTC  

You dont have wildfires and hundreds of thousands of square miles of rough terrain where you live so I wouldnt expect you to actually understand.