Just because you are too much of a progressive lemming to not understand he shills for cotes just like everyone else doesnt mean he doesnt do it

okay fine, I guess I can just chalk up every other candidate for rep in 2016 as having been lying then, and they would have built a wall

no, I just don't put up with bullshit arguments being used against either wing of government

you are deliberately not applying your own logic equally

They all shill for votes its what politicians do

Except I did, I simply said the other reps whated a different type of wall

Different means same end goal

I said that twice you merely chose to ignore it because that was the only actual point you had

did their policy language reflect that, or were they saying 'wall' and meaning something else?

you're the one implying deliberate dishonesty on the part of the candidate, I'm just asking for policy language that you still just hand wave off and say "oh he's just lying"

so were republicans lying, too?

Are you honeslty telling me I should take what a politician says at face value

I want you to say that to yourself outloud slowly

I'm saying stop talking out of your ass and provide proof

Yes I do believe the republicans are lying

Politicians are liars

Its their job

so its cynicism, then, fine

fair enough

Its called realism

and thats called semantics

All politicians shill for votes half of them likely dont believe half of what they advocate

Actually its called accuracy but keep reaching

Tldr, no I do not believe a word of what comes out of Sanders's mouth when he makes a point of trying to be the "extreme" of the democratic party I firmly believe the only reason he takes an even moderate stance on guns is specifically because of the state he lives in and the political suicide it would be to ascocate otherwise.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1t_KdGHC00

And its more than just legislative language, what kind of judges will he appoint? His cabinet, specifically AG? Will any SC justices he appoints reaffirm Heller V. United States and the peoples right to bear arms? More likely they will be lefist judges that will vote to rescind that decision. If you have more than two braincells to rub together instead of dronning on and on about "policy language" its not hard to work these things out.

Fuckin wot

San francisco

Is anyone even surprised

In the end a Sanders presidency would be the single greatest failure in US history, he would get nothing done, the establishment runs congress on both sides and he would be lame duck from day one. If he cant even keep his microphone from some shrieking harpy in seattle he isnt fit to be the most powerful person on earth.

you know there is a easy way to deal with the democratic party in cali, leave the state grab a gun of your choice , head back to cali and start blasting motherfuckers

https://www.theepochtimes.com/warren-says-wealth-tax-would-take-2-cents-from-billionaires-but-proposal-says-differently_3144122.html

I find it hard to believe that people think Warren is honest

like don't you guys have the second amendment for that very reason

Like I am in they they are all liars camp

what the fuck is it about formatting that does that to apostrophes?

seriously, what's that top line supposed to say?

But jesus fuck some of you need a mental health checkup

Fixed it for you, calm down with your nitpick cannon

thanks, that was distracting

Its just the automated thing I forgot to delete ot b4 posting