Ahh yes another failed NY progressive on the roster

Just what we need <:slurpgon:583424900732157956>

yeah, that's a bizarre thing

Bloomberg is guaranteed to fracture Dem vote

>implying the Dem vote isn't already Balkanized as-is

yyyeah, who the fuck is going to vote bloomberg? that'd be like jeb fracturing the rep vote

and it not being a meme

Slow and steady wins the race. Jeb will win this thing just you wait.

Unfort

https://pluralist.com/homeless-diarrhea-california-woman/49999

Pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft

https://pluralist.com/joy-reid-thanksgiving-problematic-msnbc-host/49999

4 day weekend. Don't care.

a'ight, fuck off ya nigger bitch, don't you talk shit about food

you've never starved, you fucking priviledged cunt

actually get hung from a tree

It's not my fault you hate your life and have nothing to be thankful for, I like my family.

Gluttony is my favorite sin. Hoping to teach my buddy's wife (she's foreign) how to make a Turkey Manhattan this year.

yeah, I'm more of a glutton than a lust

I'm horny as fuck, but I'm more after quantity than quality

I mean, I'd try for quality, if she'll give me quantity

Joke with a Russian Jew I used to date. I told her gluttony was my favorite sin, She said, "What about lust?" And I'd grab her and say, "Isn't it better when I am gluttonous with my lust?"

Subjectively I would say I won that argument but objectively we both won.

domestic terrorism

okay lets talk about the most important issue in the untied states people

cars which have blinkers that are the same color as their break lights

why is this not a talking point for presidential candidates

all this "trump bad" "communism good" "please fuck my wife"

i just want to drive safely for gods sake

People running for President have never been people. They are just shells of what people should be.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/11/climate/epa-science-trump.html

This sounds like a really good thing, is there something I'm missing? Transparency is always the best policy. I don't like the idea of a bunch of bureaucrats making policies on information that they only have access to.

The headline I think misrepresents what's happening.

If anything it's going to expand the science used.

I think whoever wrote this article bias is showing. It should be labeled as opinion.

Yeah, the headline reads as if they're rejecting science in favor of public opinion. But it's sounds more like they're just kicking out pseudoscience

Just enforcing a burden of evidence before they enact policy on it

That's what I got out of it too.

if thats the case that really is a shitty headline

still, with the republican dogma of deregulation, you can never tell

Democrats were absolute retards for letting pay-go pass. good luck getting literally any domestic spending motions through

So we just gonna accept blinkers that are the same color as breaks

I mean if you can't tell the difference between a solid light and a flashing light. That is kinda your problem.