Which brings them more revenue
Where you a member of the party?
Because I can tell you that ain't true.
Yes I was
Their news letters barely ever mentioned Sargon or Dankula
What a surprise, Weez is misrepresenting someone he doesn't like.
The meetings and online content was shilling their content 🤷
No it wasn't lmao
It was them using the platforms for their own gain.
Dankula and Sargon joining UKIP wasn't a way to gain anything. In fact it would more damage their reputation, which it did.
> wasn't a way to gain anything <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Just a happy coincidence that happened then
😉
They didn't gain anything tbf
They lost more than they gained.
they actually gained more hate than it gave them
^
Muh rape tweet
Being forced down everyone's throat during the MEP elections.
it's easy to dismiss someone because "muh ukip" after years of people calling ukip racist
good meme tho fam
You understand Sargon benefited from those "rape jokes"
There's no such thing as bad media
He benefits from all of it.
There is in the UK
No, there isn't
UK media giveth and taketh
Oh yes, all that damage to his reputation and having a milkshake thrown at him along with other food products is "benefiting"
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
yeah, we have a sense of the untouchables my dude
The media was shilling it, which means people went to his channel to see what was up
Brining him revenue.
where do you think the indians got it from
He gained revenue from that.
God this is like the Jewish conspiracy
The UK media was likely responsible for the 1997 Labour landslide
This isn't a conspiracy, this is pretty basic media organisation <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
The sun with 10M daily readers at the time worked hard to get Labour votes
When the media pushes something, people go and look at it.
They did in Sargons case, which meant they watched his content
