I posted a new question @DasBoles @Officer_Caleb @Deleted User

Yeah depends on dude.

If "romantic" is just gestures or actions of love, then obviously an Alpha can be romantic.

Gomez Addams isnt beta but hes hopeless romantic. I aspire to be romantic like Gomez is. Nothing wrong with expressive gestures of affection to someone you have that close personal bond with.

Is beta to do it for everyone you wanna bang. See that a lot.

agreed ^^^

I think a *Romantic* man is part of the responsibility of being an Alpha Male because it is part of having Chivalry. In my opinion it’s necessary. I personally believe that an Alpha Male should know when to show affection because it is an essential ingredient in a relationship. With anything else they must be equally balanced.

All sounds nice

Good thoughts

I have a friend in a relationship with what I would call a sexual manipulator. He would state that she (and his ideal woman) is an Alpha Female. Is there such a thing as an Alpha female?

@Deleted User

@DasBoles Lolz, that was one of the questions I asked above. 😂

Let me copy what I wrote above for you.

oh snap

I only saw the question about being romantic.

@DasBoles
If you are taking the definition of an alpha and a beta from a man and apply it to a woman... I would think being an alpha female is a good thing.

ALPHA = strength, righteousness, devotion
BETA = weakness, evil, in fidelity
An alpha female leads by example of what being a strong woman is. She is the definition of a virtuous woman.
To Autarchist CAL point, it is harder to raise an alpha female because of the emotional malleablity.
An ALPHA female is not fully alpha without an ALPHA male.

Yeah, Lolz, you have to scroll up quite a bit to see it.

thats too much to ask, can't be bothered with "scrolling"

😋

I gave you my answer above. Lolz

thanks, thats a good answer.

Other people had a great answers too!

I'm trying to come up with a new question.....

Can a relationship with a single mom be viable?

Oooh good one!

That can be asked about single dads too, (i think the answers are different)

I think the answer is the same, honestly.

I agree with Jesse to a certain extent.

Single parents with children should only be with other single parents with children. Singles with no children fair better with singles with no children.
In this case, the adults have to put their selfish ways behind them and ensure that the bond between the child and the other biological parent is still good.

However, there is complexity that comes with all of that when kids are involved. It would be a delicate balancing act.

However, scripture does not talk about being the husband of multiple wives and kids and I think that is where Jesse is getting that from.

Anyway, in short, it is viable but very difficult. It must be done right.

I guess it gets more nuanced as well if you consider if they had this child out of wedlock or if there was a marriage.

Also you are probably right, no real difference between a single mom and single dad.

single parents should strive to be one and raise their children legitimately.

By getting into a relationship with either, you are an interference to that process.

So yeah, no real nuance either. Sometimes I speak too soon with whatever frivolous ideal pops into my head. I'm trying to overcome that.

I have a question that just spawned from your response. But I will wait till everyone answers your question first. @DasBoles

That is a pretty good answer you have. I agree to it!