It's better if I learn it myself
"Futile" >Didn't even try to defend his position
If it weren't for the free speech principle of this server he'd have been beaten and exiled by mods already.
Orly
There wasn't any position to begin with
Oh right
"objective moral standards" is not a position, you're right
π π π
No, there was no position because there was no debate
His position was very clear
Hop off of Ducc's dick
"iN yOuR mInD"
You claimed the debate was already settled
But it wasn't
It is if it's one-sided
What is one-sided?
Rartar
imagine being such a subjectivist you think that your own solipsistic willpower can *a posteriori* respark a discussion that was never actually had.
You were the only one willing to start shit
That's what's going on right now
Imagine claiming that objective moral standards exist without any objections
@π·ππππππππ
That was only ever your claim, dipfuck.
I "started shit" by questioning your thesis hahaha
You want to go on about benevolence and malevolence?
My thesis wasn't about objective standards, shitass.
Cosmic good and evil?
Fuck off.
Yes it was
My thesis was about tolerance as a false-virtue.
https://gyazo.com/a9a1ab61bd2aed7da4abbde9cb646026
That discussion has long concluded.
That is a small part of the *second* point.
That isn't even the thesis.
"The false-virtue of tolerance is absence of objective moral standards"
Thesis
**The whole point of the discussion is in 1.**
Objective is objective as a concept
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967804483371009/646092552847622164/1548635753410.jpg
Your whole argument will be considered, not only your main argument
Because it's a word, it is subjective
