Message from @spooky ducc
Discord ID: 646116480210960395
You claimed the debate was already settled
But it wasn't
It is if it's one-sided
What is one-sided?
Rartar
imagine being such a subjectivist you think that your own solipsistic willpower can *a posteriori* respark a discussion that was never actually had.
You were the only one willing to start shit
That's what's going on right now
Imagine claiming that objective moral standards exist without any objections
That was only ever your claim, dipfuck.
I "started shit" by questioning your thesis hahaha
You want to go on about benevolence and malevolence?
My thesis wasn't about objective standards, shitass.
Cosmic good and evil?
Fuck off.
Yes it was
My thesis was about tolerance as a false-virtue.
That discussion has long concluded.
That isn't even the thesis.
"The false-virtue of tolerance is absence of objective moral standards"
Thesis
**The whole point of the discussion is in 1.**
Objective is objective as a concept
Your whole argument will be considered, not only your main argument
Because it's a word, it is subjective
To at least some extent
And if I don't wish to have this conversation with somebody who initiates it in such grossly bad faith?
Then say that instead of saying "there is no debate"
That is the same point, niggroid.
No it's not
You claimed I'm the only one who objects
Stop trying to debate semantics rather than concepts
There is no debate because the point of the prior debate has been made, and all parties have dismissed. You were never a fucking party.
And I don't want to have a debate with you, asshole.
Because you are an asshole
Digging it up in bad faith
Poor choice of words then, that's your fault, not mine