cool your jets it will happen

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/0Cu6C3FbUoU93sFAi22DNLw9XYmWr2bVsCRTvJ8sd1E/https/i.imgur.com/HkPpOfV.png

Those eyes man

I'ma copy this and spread it around lol

Man sells his baby for $11,000 and spends the cash on tipping female streamers
The man is charged with child trafficking.
> https://reclaimthenet.org/man-china-sells-baby-tip-streamers/

When will people understand it's just drawings, and "No Real Humans are involved."

~~~
South Korea Supreme Court Rules That Sexually Explicit Anime and Manga Images of Teenagers Are Images of Child Sexual Abuse
> https://boundingintocomics.com/2019/11/13/south-korea-supreme-court-rules-that-sexually-explicit-anime-and-manga-images-of-teenagers-are-images-of-child-sexual-abuse/
|
Adults hate a specific country, but the young ones like them bc of their media
So what can you do to stop this "bad" influence" ?

Ohhh....right
~ <https://twitter.com/Hi3cchi/status/1194718780083130370>

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/13/health/china-plague-intl-hnk-scn-scli/index.html

Australia banned porn where the actress was perceived as less than 18.

Uk banned the production of face sitting porn and Epstein didn't commit suicide.

Isn't it funny, anywhere communism grows, they either get the black plague, or typhus...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7680463/Moment-bikers-pickpocket-headlock.html

https://youtu.be/6CzHsibqpIs

steal from anyone: scum

steal from an old person: scummer

steal from an old person selling poppies for memorial day stuff: kill yourself

Old news, upon new news...

~~~
FACEBOOK APP SECRETLY ACCESSING PEOPLE'S CAMERA AS THEY READ NEWS FEED
Company claims strange behaviour is result of a bug, but there is an easy fix to stay safe
> https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-app-recording-camera-iphone-ios-news-feed-bug-update-fix-workaround-a9200696.html

If any of you missed it. The head of the impeachment inquiry saying that he has no idea who the whistleblower is.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967610706526210/644205859160850447/Schiff.mp4

"I don't know the identity of the whistle-blower, I want to make sure that identity is protected."
HHHHMMMMMMMMM

That's such horse shit.

Like, blatant lie.

<:activated:504340346398834691>

[NATIONAL]
Bishop who investigated sex abuse in Buffalo accused of sex abuse
> https://www.wivb.com/news/national/bishop-who-investigated-sex-abuse-accused-of-sex-abuse/

<:hyperthink:462282519883284480>

Childhood comeback: "It takes one to know one!"

Venice is being flooded by the highest tide in more than 50 years l ABC News
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQJlY3y_Exk

Italy has too many tourists spending billions of $, we should help them by not going into to the stinky shithole called venice and leave the old romans to drown.

#ReleaseTheTape

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27-8ltc07oI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFAI0RUGtto

NEW YOUTUBE TERMS: ACCOUNTS DEEMED NOT “COMMERCIALLY VIABLE” CAN BE DELETED
Well that escalated quickly…
> https://www.infowars.com/new-youtube-terms-accounts-deemed-not-commercially-viable-can-be-deleted/

That or just: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNa4c6k5xlU

The critical part is "Terminations by YouTube for Service Changes

YouTube may terminate your access, or your Google account’s access to all or part of the Service if YouTube believes, in its sole discretion, that provision of the Service to you is no longer commercially viable."

Which can be also interpreted that if **A SERVICE** becomes not commercially viable, they have the permission to **TERMINATE THE SERVICE** (thus terminating your account's access to the service **BECAUSE THE SERVICE ITSELF DOESN'T EXIST**).

So which way is it? It's such badly written paragraph since it can be interpreted either way.

And why is it under "Account Suspension & Termination"?

Having studied law, I have a reasonable understanding of legalese and get why ToS contracts are written the way they are; yet I agree with Styx's analysis here. They couldn't have written this more poorly if their intentions were genuinely noble.

He's absolutely correct that not one person, trained or untrained, reasonably interpreted it to mean what they're claiming it means; and so everyone is justifiably terrified of the implications of this. It's worse than a bank run. Most of the damage has been done by this point scaring potential creators off.

Couple this with Tim Pool's insider analysis that this is a barrier for new content creators and this could be the beginning of the end for YT. So much so I'm considering doing future videos on a different host site over this.

I'm more worries about "You agree not to access Content through any technology or means other than the video playback pages of the Service itself, the Embeddable Player, or other explicitly authorized means YouTube may designate." being changed to "circumvent, disable, fraudulently engage with, or otherwise interfere with any part of the Service (or attempt to do any of these things), including security-related features or features that (a) prevent or restrict the copying or other use of Content or (b) limit the use of the Service or Content;"

(The Permissions and Restrictions part has been completely rewritten but those are roughly the equivalent parts.)

Even the older version prohibited use of hacked versions of Youtube Android app (such as Youtube Vanced).

But the newer version expands it to prohibit use of any software that partially blocks YT services (that includes Youtube Vanced since it adblocks) but will further include all other ad blockers, in regular browsers, not just hacked YT app. Like: access YT with Adblock Plus or NoScript => banned, locked out of your GMail and might as well throw your Android phone in the trash bin.

And I'm pretty paranoid, so I never stay logged into my Gmail on desktop, not logged into YT while I browse it. And I don't log into Youtube on Android either **BUT** since it's a Google phone, Google might know if I accessed YT without logging in. The phone itself is always logged in after all.

There's just way too much power in the hands of Google, when majority of mobile phones rely on Gmail accounts.