Message from @lungfish
Discord ID: 645093298658213908
Like the ends justify the means?
Do you agree that your path towards the goal should be the same as the goal itself?
its an unfortunate feat of bad genes that they think that way @lungfish
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Specifically libertarian race realist types
@Monstrous Moonshine Many Revolutionary Communists detest Anarchocommunists and many of them detest Antifa.
"The ends justify the means" would be the opposite of path = goal
Doesn't make them that different, just tribal.
If they detest Nazis it's mainly over nuances, or their failure on Russia, or something to that effect
And mostly that detestation is performative; many of them (like me) have watched The Greatest Story Never Told
No, what I mean is this
Yeah, usual WN arguments against nazis aren't policies, it's strategic shortcoming of Hitler, loss to Slavs, not winning the war.
@lungfish It is over many things. Most of America was essentially WN till 1965, yet none of those would've had particular obsession with Nazis
And because tribally they want to be American variant of that, not pro-Germany.
where the blacks justifed in running out all the white people in south afrrica?
That's why they say USA was national socialists in the 40's.
And they kinda were. They had racial concentration camps.
Humans are tribal by nature
damn japs
There was an American Nazi movement which was reasonably successful but when we went to war with Germany that all ended because it was no longer acceptable to the mainstream
And nigger cannonfodder squads.
Using niggers like Imperial Guard.
the way god meant it to be
If your goal is, lets say, to put freedom above all, for example.
Is it ok to - on your way towards said freedom - infringe on some freedom, or not?
You can interchange "freedom" with anything else
When WN say they are not nazis, they mean they are "the good, American kind of nazi".
Policy wise, what is the difference?
AFAIK, same game, different teams.
So basically, my goal is a ethnostate, would it be ok to hurt...
@lungfish In 1943, 90% of Americans said they'd rather lose the war than end segregation. Were they all Nazis?
White people? Optics?
Or people in general?
(And most of WN would probably say USA should have partaken in WW2 so they aren't exactly anti-German-type-of-Nazi, either.)
@Monstrous Moonshine I will request a source on that since I've never heard it before
Sure
They would have preferred if Ameri-Nazis didn't fight German-Nazis.
And I'm willing to accept edgy sources, it doesn't have to be in the New York Times
If your goal is the ethnostate, then the question would be this: is it ok to infringe on the construction of an ethnostate and temporarily increase the number of other ethnic demographics in order to eventually have an ethnostate?
https://muse.jhu.edu/book/30108
Chapter 3, Page 81 @lungfish
But they are totally not nazis even when they are ethnonationalist AND socialist AND authoritarian AND culturally pro-censorshit, AND against free speech AND Jews.