They might be broken only cause it’s so easy to break them

Your views on the age of consent aren't absolute

they are not based on objective morals

Most of my beliefs are absolute

I hold stead fast in that belief

it's simple really

don't diddle kids

Science says you can only consent the minute you’ve been alive for 18 revolutions around the sun

and if you like lolis

Its so the stars line up you see

do you think a 45 year old man should have the right to fuck a 18 year old?

you're borderline pedo

Fiddle the youth get riddled with holes in the booth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZQJFbrqjUY

do I think he has the right? yes. do I think it's normal? no

my parents are 10 years apart

so he has the right once the person turns 18 but before their birthday they are still a child

makes sense

lol

What’s normal in the first world is for people to have 1 kid when they’re 35 now

fuck normal

why that vid sounds like some 12y old faggot i blew up in COD ?

this is why the system is broken

age of consent is base on objective standards

the system works

so all of a sudden someone can handle a gun at 18?

No

what is your point

it is also based on objective ones

your the exception that needs adjustment

it can be both

But i think younger gun owners should have to go through more training

for example
inner genital wall tearing

We should let twelve year olds chug jack Daniels in pubs

edik, why that thinking ?

We draw distinct lines for clarity in law. Those laws are not absolute. That’s why a 19 can date a 16 year old. Or a 12 year old can be put on trial for murder but a 8 year old cannot.

also
"muh social harm"

if they can have sex then they can have a fully loaded uzi

cmon man

afraid they might shoot your pedo dick off ???