Has a point

"it's only ok when i do it"

If someone touches my kid or a kid I can see, I'd kill them. Period.

Forcing people to debate for opinions they disagree with is so fucking stupid.

it's actually a useful skill to have

^^

No its not.

yes it is

i think seeing a kid being fucked would grant you a preety solid temerary insanity case

@Ferris I really wanted to be aff, but the coin toss stole my decision there.

trains your empathy, your intellectual rigor

don't argue with a piece of Iron

you will lose

Why would you ever debate for something you are against?

because that way you can undersstand your opponents better?

a debate isn't about your personal feelings

You should learn to be skilled in debate about something you are passionate about.

unless, you want to strawman everything like a wimp

it's about captuing the audience

@IAmAlwaysWatching that's how you learn about other people's position, dingus

I have always been a devil's advocate, I will always bat for an unspoken for side, unless, it's something like FUCKING CHILDREN.

If you only ever discuss what you know, you don't learn anything

I do think the only way you can **legibly** kill people is on the battlefield

when BOTH of you hold weapons.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. And Hitler was a great orater because he loved Jewish people deep down inside.

However,

I think art school did that to him.

that reply is incredibly dumb

the hard part is getting someone come to the battle with you in full mind and purpose.

Not his feelings for jews.

i think someone is confusing law and morality again

^

@SufferBuddy well that's just your feelings getting on the way. It is worth discussing rationally. You don't have to justify it, just explore how and why it isn't.

@ManAnimal What the difference then?

I'm not dumb if I'm right.

and you are sure you are right because...?

***I F***

ah.. yes you are

Because I am.

How do we figure that part out?

even a blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally